Literature DB >> 16045530

Long term review of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

P J Higgs1, H-L Chua, A R B Smith.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Assessment of long term outcome following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
DESIGN: Retrospective follow up study using standardised examination with pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POP-Q) and questionnaires.
SETTING: A tertiary urogynaecology unit in the North West of England. POPULATION: One hundred and forty consecutive cases who had a laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy at St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, between 1993 and 1999.
METHODS: Women completed questionnaires and were examined in gynaecology clinic or sent postal questionnaires if unable to attend the clinic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adequacy of vault support and recurrent vaginal prolapse assessed by POP-Q score. Assessment of prolapse, urinary and bowel symptoms and sexual function using questionnaires.
RESULTS: One hundred and three women were contacted after a median of 66 months. Sixty-six women were examined and a further 37 women filled in questionnaires only. Recurrent vault prolapse occurred in 4 of the 66 women who were examined. Prolapse had recurred or persisted in 21 of 66 women, with equal numbers of anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse. Overall, 81/102 (79%) said that their symptoms of prolapse were 'cured' or 'improved'; 39/103 (38%) still had symptoms of prolapse. For every two women who were cured of their urinary or bowel symptoms, one woman developed worse symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: Among the 66 women available for examination laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy provided good long term support of the vault in 92%. Forty-two percent of these women had recurrent vaginal wall prolapse. Despite this, 79% of women felt that their symptoms of prolapse were cured or improved following surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16045530     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00646.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  34 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of using mesh in surgery for uterine or vaginal vault prolapse.

Authors:  Xueli Jia; Cathryn Glazener; Graham Mowatt; David Jenkinson; Cynthia Fraser; Christine Bain; Jennifer Burr
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Laparoscopic sacral colpoperineopexy: abdominal versus abdominal-vaginal posterior graft attachment.

Authors:  Colleen D McDermott; Jean Park; Colin L Terry; Patrick J Woodman; Douglass S Hale
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Long-term outcome after transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Pia Heinonen; Riikka Aaltonen; Kirsi Joronen; Seija Ala-Nissilä
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for uterine and post-hysterectomy prolapse: anatomical results, quality of life and perioperative outcome-a prospective study with 101 cases.

Authors:  Dimitri Sarlos; Sonja Brandner; LaVonne Kots; Nicolle Gygax; Gabriel Schaer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-06-07

5.  Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: an observational study of functional and anatomical outcomes.

Authors:  Natalia Price; Alex Slack; Simon R Jackson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Central compartment and apical defect repair using synthetic mesh.

Authors:  Karen Soules; J Christian Winters; Christopher J Chermansky
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 7.  Update in management of vaginal mesh erosion.

Authors:  Jean-Nicolas Cornu; Laurence Peyrat; François Haab
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Recovery after robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: the patients' perspective.

Authors:  Anna R McNanley; Erin E Duecy; Michael K Flynn; Gunhilde M Buchsbaum
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-02-23

9.  Comparative outcomes of open versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy among Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Aqsa Khan; Marianna Alperin; Ning Wu; J Quentin Clemens; Emily Dubina; Chris L Pashos; Jennifer T Anger
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Symptomatic and quality of life outcomes after site-specific fascial reattachment for pelvic organ prolapse repair.

Authors:  Abdalla M Fayyad; Emma Redhead; Noveen Awan; Maria Kyrgiou; Sanjeev Prashar; Simon R Hill
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-09-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.