Literature DB >> 11277060

Promontofixation for the treatment of prolapse.

A Wattiez1, M Canis, G Mage, J L Pouly, M A Bruhat.   

Abstract

Genital prolapse is a common problem in women. The wide variety of surgical techniques used to treat this problem demonstrate how difficult it is to manage. Laparoscopic surgery offers a new approach. It allows a good view of the anterior and posterior compartments so that a global approach for the prolapse is possible by the same surgical route. Traditional promontofixation can be combined with a new approach to the posterior compartment. Laparoscopic promontofixation through installation of an intervesicouterine prosthesis for the treatment of hysterocele and cystocele is associated with paravaginal repair of lateral defects and a Burch anterior colposuspension for urinary stress incontinence. When combined with laparoscopic treatment of rectocele by myorrhaphy and reinforcement of the fascia by means of a prosthesis, it provides a complete range of treatment for all types of feminine prolapse. After 20 years of experience through laparotomy, promontofixation using a triangle has been carried out by laparoscopy at the authors' center since 1991 in an attempt to eliminate the cystocele by solidly anchoring the uterus and bladder floor to the promontory. This laparoscopic technique follows the usual steps for pelvic prolapse repair: 1. Total or subtotal hysterectomy or suspension of the uterus is performed in such a way that it returns to normal physiologic position, and a solid subvesical floor is created. 2. The physiologic axis of the vagina is restored by creating a strong, low posterior point of support and by performing culdoplasty. 3. Evident or latent stress incontinence is treated. It would be pointless to treat the hysterocele on its own because, once the prolapse has been cured, the subvesical mass will disappear and allow urinary incontinence to appear. 4. Reconstruction of the posterior rectovaginal support structures seems to be mandatory and is carried out in almost all cases. The first phase of the laparoscopic approach to pelvic prolapse allowed the authors to explore the technical aspects. Several approaches are possible by laparoscopy. Herein, the authors report 8 years of technical research and assessment. This experience confirms the tremendous potential of laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of all aspects of this pathology by the same route. Stress incontinence, cystocele, hysterocele, rectocele, or enterocele can be treated. The operative time is longer than with the open route, and the surgeon must be highly experienced. Based on their experience, the authors are discovering new concepts. More data are required before a conclusion can be drawn concerning this promising new approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11277060     DOI: 10.1016/s0094-0143(01)80017-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0094-0143            Impact factor:   2.241


  9 in total

1.  Mobility and stress analysis of different surgical simulations during a sacral colpopexy, using a finite element model of the pelvic system.

Authors:  Estelle Jeanditgautier; Olivier Mayeur; Mathias Brieu; Gery Lamblin; Chrystele Rubod; Michel Cosson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  [Laparoscopic pelvic surgery: Where do we stand in the year 2006?].

Authors:  J Rassweiler; D Teber; J de la Rosette; P Laguna; V Pansodoro; T Frede
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for uterine and post-hysterectomy prolapse: anatomical results, quality of life and perioperative outcome-a prospective study with 101 cases.

Authors:  Dimitri Sarlos; Sonja Brandner; LaVonne Kots; Nicolle Gygax; Gabriel Schaer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-06-07

4.  Laparoscopic sacral suture hysteropexy for uterine prolapse.

Authors:  Hannah G Krause; Judith T W Goh; Kate Sloane; Peta Higgs; Marcus P Carey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-11-30

5.  Complications and reoperations after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with a mean follow-up of 4 years.

Authors:  David Vandendriessche; Julie Sussfeld; Géraldine Giraudet; Jean-Philippe Lucot; Hélène Behal; Michel Cosson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 6.  Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with ileal conduit diversion.

Authors:  R F van Velthoven; T Piechaud
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.862

Review 7.  Laparoscopic techniques for the repair of vaginal vault prolapse: determining if less is more.

Authors:  E James Wright; Li-Ming Su
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.862

8.  Nerve preserving vs standard laparoscopic sacropexy: Postoperative bowel function.

Authors:  Stefano Cosma; Paolo Petruzzelli; Saverio Danese; Chiara Benedetto
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-05-16

9.  Comparison of first versus second line sacrocolpopexies in terms of morbidity and mid-term efficacy.

Authors:  Marine Lallemant; A T M Grob; M Puyraveau; M A G Perik; A H H Alhafidh; M Cosson; R Ramanah
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.996

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.