Literature DB >> 18536551

Phase 0 clinical trials: conceptions and misconceptions.

Shivaani Kummar1, Larry Rubinstein, Robert Kinders, Ralph E Parchment, Martin E Gutierrez, Anthony J Murgo, Jay Ji, Barbara Mroczkowski, Oxana K Pickeral, Mel Simpson, Melinda Hollingshead, Sherry X Yang, Lee Helman, Robert Wiltrout, Jerry Collins, Joseph E Tomaszewski, James H Doroshow.   

Abstract

Phase 0 clinical trials, developed in response to the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s recent exploratory Investigational New Drug (IND) guidance, are intended to expedite the clinical evaluation of new molecular entities. The exploratory IND supports the performance of first-in-human testing of new investigational agents at subtherapeutic doses based on reduced manufacturing and toxicologic requirements, allowing the demonstration of drug-target effects and assessment of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships in humans earlier in clinical development. The objectives of a phase 0 cancer clinical trial are to establish at the very earliest opportunity-before large numbers of patients have been accrued and exposed to potential drug-associated toxicity-whether an agent is modulating its target in a tumor, and consequently whether further clinical development is warranted. We review here the fundamental requirements of clinical studies conducted under an exploratory IND and address some common misconceptions regarding oncologic phase 0 trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18536551      PMCID: PMC7185299          DOI: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e318172d6f3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer J        ISSN: 1528-9117            Impact factor:   3.360


  22 in total

Review 1.  Development of target-based antineoplastic agents.

Authors:  W M Stadler; M J Ratain
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 2.  Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates?

Authors:  Ismail Kola; John Landis
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Rethinking risk-benefit assessment for phase I cancer trials.

Authors:  Steven Joffe; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Use of microdosing to predict pharmacokinetics at the therapeutic dose: experience with 5 drugs.

Authors:  Graham Lappin; Wilhelm Kuhnz; Roeline Jochemsen; Johannes Kneer; Ajai Chaudhary; Berend Oosterhuis; Willem Jan Drijfhout; Malcolm Rowland; R Colin Garner
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Are we taking without giving in return? The ethics of research-related biopsies and the benefits of clinical trial participation.

Authors:  Paul R Helft; Christopher K Daugherty
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Nontraditional approaches to first-in-human studies to increase efficiency of drug development: will microdose studies make a significant impact?

Authors:  R A Boyd; R L Lalonde
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 7.  Big physics, small doses: the use of AMS and PET in human microdosing of development drugs.

Authors:  Graham Lappin; R Colin Garner
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 84.694

8.  ABT-888, an orally active poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor that potentiates DNA-damaging agents in preclinical tumor models.

Authors:  Cherrie K Donawho; Yan Luo; Yanping Luo; Thomas D Penning; Joy L Bauch; Jennifer J Bouska; Velitchka D Bontcheva-Diaz; Bryan F Cox; Theodore L DeWeese; Larry E Dillehay; Debra C Ferguson; Nayereh S Ghoreishi-Haack; David R Grimm; Ran Guan; Edward K Han; Rhonda R Holley-Shanks; Boris Hristov; Kenneth B Idler; Ken Jarvis; Eric F Johnson; Lawrence R Kleinberg; Vered Klinghofer; Loren M Lasko; Xuesong Liu; Kennan C Marsh; Thomas P McGonigal; Jonathan A Meulbroek; Amanda M Olson; Joann P Palma; Luis E Rodriguez; Yan Shi; Jason A Stavropoulos; Alan C Tsurutani; Gui-Dong Zhu; Saul H Rosenberg; Vincent L Giranda; David J Frost
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Ethics of phase 1 oncology studies: reexamining the arguments and data.

Authors:  Manish Agrawal; Ezekiel J Emanuel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-08-27       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Participants in phase 1 oncology research trials: are they vulnerable?

Authors:  Justine Seidenfeld; Elizabeth Horstmann; Ezekiel J Emanuel; Christine Grady
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-01-14
View more
  30 in total

1.  Phase 0 and window of opportunity clinical trial design in neuro-oncology: a RANO review.

Authors:  Michael A Vogelbaum; Daria Krivosheya; Hamid Borghei-Razavi; Nader Sanai; Michael Weller; Wolfgang Wick; Riccardo Soffietti; David A Reardon; Manish K Aghi; Evanthia Galanis; Patrick Y Wen; Martin van den Bent; Susan Chang
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 2.  Accelerator mass spectrometry-enabled studies: current status and future prospects.

Authors:  Ali Arjomand
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 3.  Suitable trial designs and cohorts for preventive breast cancer agents.

Authors:  Kathrin Strasser-Weippl; Paul E Goss
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 4.  Assessing the translatability of drug projects: what needs to be scored to predict success?

Authors:  Martin Wehling
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 84.694

5.  Phase 0 Trial of AZD1775 in First-Recurrence Glioblastoma Patients.

Authors:  Nader Sanai; Jing Li; Julie Boerner; Karri Stark; Jianmei Wu; Seongho Kim; Alanna Derogatis; Shwetal Mehta; Harshil D Dhruv; Lance K Heilbrun; Michael E Berens; Patricia M LoRusso
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  FGFR-TACC gene fusions in human glioma.

Authors:  Anna Lasorella; Marc Sanson; Antonio Iavarone
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 7.  A Review on: Phase '0' Clinical Trials or Exploratory Investigational New Drug.

Authors:  Ashish A Gawai; Faisal Shaikh; Mangesh Gadekar; Nitin Deokar; Shivanand Kolhe; K R Biyani
Journal:  Turk J Pharm Sci       Date:  2017-04-15

8.  Advancing the evidence base of rehabilitation treatments: a developmental approach.

Authors:  John Whyte; A M Barrett
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 9.  Cancer prevention research - then and now.

Authors:  Ann M Bode; Zigang Dong
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 10.  The Comparative Oncology Trials Consortium: using spontaneously occurring cancers in dogs to inform the cancer drug development pathway.

Authors:  Ira Gordon; Melissa Paoloni; Christina Mazcko; Chand Khanna
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.