Literature DB >> 17185993

Nontraditional approaches to first-in-human studies to increase efficiency of drug development: will microdose studies make a significant impact?

R A Boyd1, R L Lalonde.   

Abstract

Much has been written recently about low productivity in the pharmaceutical industry and the high cost of drug development. Over a 10-year period ending in 2000, only approximately 11% of compounds tested in humans across 10 large pharmaceutical companies were eventually approved for marketing in the United States and/or Europe. Attrition was highest during phase II (62%) but still significant in phase III (45%) and at the time of registration (23%). Clearly, given the high cost and time required for clinical development, these late-stage failures are unsustainable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17185993     DOI: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  14 in total

1.  Evaluation of agile designs in first-in-human (FIH) trials--a simulation study.

Authors:  Itay Perlstein; James A Bolognese; Rajesh Krishna; John A Wagner
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 2.  New era for drug discovery and development in renal disease.

Authors:  Toshio Miyata; Katsushi Kikuchi; Hideyasu Kiyomoto; Charles van Ypersele de Strihou
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 28.314

3.  A human microdose study of the antimalarial drug GSK3191607 in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Malek Okour; Geo Derimanov; Rodger Barnett; Esther Fernandez; Santiago Ferrer; Stephanie Gresham; Mohammad Hossain; Francisco-Javier Gamo; Gavin Koh; Adrian Pereira; Katie Rolfe; Deborah Wong; Graeme Young; Harshad Rami; John Haselden
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Prediction of nonlinear intestinal absorption of CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein substrates from their in vitro Km values.

Authors:  Tatsuhiko Tachibana; Motohiro Kato; Yuichi Sugiyama
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 5.  A Review on: Phase '0' Clinical Trials or Exploratory Investigational New Drug.

Authors:  Ashish A Gawai; Faisal Shaikh; Mangesh Gadekar; Nitin Deokar; Shivanand Kolhe; K R Biyani
Journal:  Turk J Pharm Sci       Date:  2017-04-15

6.  Phase 0 trials: expediting the development of chemoprevention agents.

Authors:  Shivaani Kummar; James H Doroshow
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-03

7.  Food and drug administration's critical path initiative and innovations in drug development paradigm: Challenges, progress, and controversies.

Authors:  Rajiv Mahajan; Kapil Gupta
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2010-10

Review 8.  Phase 0 clinical trials: recommendations from the Task Force on Methodology for the Development of Innovative Cancer Therapies.

Authors:  Shivaani Kummar; James H Doroshow; Joseph E Tomaszewski; A Hilary Calvert; Marinus Lobbezoo; Giuseppe Giaccone
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 9.  Phase 0 clinical trials: conceptions and misconceptions.

Authors:  Shivaani Kummar; Larry Rubinstein; Robert Kinders; Ralph E Parchment; Martin E Gutierrez; Anthony J Murgo; Jay Ji; Barbara Mroczkowski; Oxana K Pickeral; Mel Simpson; Melinda Hollingshead; Sherry X Yang; Lee Helman; Robert Wiltrout; Jerry Collins; Joseph E Tomaszewski; James H Doroshow
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.360

Review 10.  Microdosing and drug development: past, present and future.

Authors:  Graham Lappin; Robert Noveck; Tal Burt
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 4.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.