Literature DB >> 32454598

A Review on: Phase '0' Clinical Trials or Exploratory Investigational New Drug.

Ashish A Gawai1, Faisal Shaikh1, Mangesh Gadekar1, Nitin Deokar1, Shivanand Kolhe1, K R Biyani1.   

Abstract

In a move to speed up the development of new medicines, the Food and Drug Administration announced in January 2006 the creation of the exploratory Investigational New Drug (IND), the so-called phase '0' clinical trials. This guidance is intended to clarify what preclinical and clinical approaches, as well as chemistry, manufacturing, and controls information, should be considered when planning exploratory studies in humans, including studies of closely related drugs or therapeutic biological products, under an IND application (21 CFR 312). Existing regulations allow a great deal of flexibility in the amount of data that needs to be submitted with an IND application, depending on the goals of the proposed investigation, the specific human testing proposed, and the expected risks. The agency believes that sponsors have not taken full advantage of that flexibility and often provide more supporting information in INDs than is required by regulations. This guidance is intended to clarify what manufacturing controls, preclinical testing, and clinical approaches can be considered when planning limited, early exploratory IND studies in humans. ©Copyright 2017 Turk J Pharm Sci, Published by Galenos Publishing House.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IND; clinical trials; phase 0; preclinical testing

Year:  2017        PMID: 32454598      PMCID: PMC7227998          DOI: 10.4274/tjps.63935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 1304-530X


  20 in total

1.  Implications of pharmaceutical industry funding on clinical research.

Authors:  Joel R Lexchin
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 3.154

2.  A proposal for radical changes in the drug-approval process.

Authors:  Alastair J J Wood
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Use of microdosing to predict pharmacokinetics at the therapeutic dose: experience with 5 drugs.

Authors:  Graham Lappin; Wilhelm Kuhnz; Roeline Jochemsen; Johannes Kneer; Ajai Chaudhary; Berend Oosterhuis; Willem Jan Drijfhout; Malcolm Rowland; R Colin Garner
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  The phase 0 microdosing concept.

Authors:  R Colin Garner; Graham Lappin
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Phase 0 clinical trials: an answer to drug development stagnation?

Authors:  Patricia M LoRusso
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-13       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Patient perspectives on phase 0 clinical trials.

Authors:  Martin Gutierrez; Deborah Collyar
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Human microdosing; a boon or a bane?

Authors:  S D Seth; Nandini K Kumar; Pradeep Dua
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 8.  Trends in risks associated with new drug development: success rates for investigational drugs.

Authors:  J A DiMasi; L Feldman; A Seckler; A Wilson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 9.  Big physics, small doses: the use of AMS and PET in human microdosing of development drugs.

Authors:  Graham Lappin; R Colin Garner
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 84.694

10.  Designing phase 0 cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Anthony J Murgo; Shivaani Kummar; Larry Rubinstein; Martin Gutierrez; Jerry Collins; Robert Kinders; Ralph E Parchment; Jiuping Ji; Seth M Steinberg; Sherry X Yang; Melinda Hollingshead; Alice Chen; Lee Helman; Robert Wiltrout; Joseph E Tomaszewski; James H Doroshow
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.