Literature DB >> 22683206

Advancing the evidence base of rehabilitation treatments: a developmental approach.

John Whyte1, A M Barrett.   

Abstract

Translational research refers to the development of new scientific discoveries into evidence-based treatments for human diseases and conditions. This developmental process requires that a number of scientific, as well as social and psychological obstacles, be overcome during a sequence of research stages that address different goals. Rehabilitation, like other biomedical disciplines, requires this kind of developmental process. For a variety of reasons, however, development of rehabilitation treatments is less linear than the familiar phases of pharmaceutical research. In addition, research on treatments intended to address impairments (body structure/function, in terms of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health), faces the challenge of determining the likely impact of an impairment-level treatment on the multifaceted activities and aspects of participation that are the typical goals of rehabilitation treatments. This article describes the application of treatment theory and enablement theory to the development of new impairment-based treatments, and examines similarities and differences between the developmental sequence needed for rehabilitation treatment research versus pharmaceutical research in other areas of medicine.
Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22683206      PMCID: PMC3732479          DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.11.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  34 in total

1.  The changing view of neurorehabilitation: a new era of optimism.

Authors:  Leslie J Gonzalez Rothi; Anna M Barrett
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.892

2.  Treatments to enhance recovery from the vegetative and minimally conscious states: ethical issues surrounding efficacy studies.

Authors:  John Whyte
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.159

3.  A phased developmental approach to neurorehabilitation research: the science of knowledge building.

Authors:  John Whyte; Wayne Gordon; Leslie J Gonzalez Rothi
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Adverse effect of dopamine agonist therapy in a patient with motor-intentional neglect.

Authors:  A M Barrett; G P Crucian; R L Schwartz; K M Heilman
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  The Moss Attention Rating Scale for traumatic brain injury: initial psychometric assessment.

Authors:  John Whyte; Tessa Hart; Rita K Bode; James F Malec
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Sustained arousal and attention after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  J Whyte; M Polansky; M Fleming; H B Coslett; C Cavallucci
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  The Moss Attention Rating Scale for traumatic brain injury: further explorations of reliability and sensitivity to change.

Authors:  John Whyte; Tessa Hart; Colin A Ellis; Inna Chervoneva
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 8.  Rose-colored answers: neuropsychological deficits and patient-reported outcomes after stroke.

Authors:  Anna M Barrett
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.342

Review 9.  Phase 0 clinical trials: conceptions and misconceptions.

Authors:  Shivaani Kummar; Larry Rubinstein; Robert Kinders; Ralph E Parchment; Martin E Gutierrez; Anthony J Murgo; Jay Ji; Barbara Mroczkowski; Oxana K Pickeral; Mel Simpson; Melinda Hollingshead; Sherry X Yang; Lee Helman; Robert Wiltrout; Jerry Collins; Joseph E Tomaszewski; James H Doroshow
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.360

10.  Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise.

Authors:  Nancy S Sung; William F Crowley; Myron Genel; Patricia Salber; Lewis Sandy; Louis M Sherwood; Stephen B Johnson; Veronica Catanese; Hugh Tilson; Kenneth Getz; Elaine L Larson; David Scheinberg; E Albert Reece; Harold Slavkin; Adrian Dobs; Jack Grebb; Rick A Martinez; Allan Korn; David Rimoin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Spatial cognitive rehabilitation and motor recovery after stroke.

Authors:  A M Barrett; Tufail Muzaffar
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.710

2.  Making the best match: selecting outcome measures for clinical trials and outcome studies.

Authors:  Wendy J Coster
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr

3.  Considerations in the efficacy and effectiveness of virtual reality interventions for stroke rehabilitation: moving the field forward.

Authors:  Rachel Proffitt; Belinda Lange
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2014-10-24

4.  Developing complex interventions: lessons learned from a pilot study examining strategy training in acute stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Skidmore; Deirdre R Dawson; Ellen M Whyte; Meryl A Butters; Mary Amanda Dew; Emily S Grattan; James T Becker; Margo B Holm
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.477

5.  Knowing What We're Doing: Why Specification of Treatment Methods Is Critical for Evidence-Based Practice in Speech-Language Pathology.

Authors:  Lyn S Turkstra; Rocío Norman; John Whyte; Marcel P Dijkers; Tessa Hart
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  Training to Optimize Learning after Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Skidmore
Journal:  Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep       Date:  2015-06-01

Review 7.  Prism adaptation for spatial neglect after stroke: translational practice gaps.

Authors:  A M Barrett; Kelly M Goedert; Julia C Basso
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 42.937

8.  Current Practice and Barriers in Cancer Rehabilitation: Perspectives of Korean Physiatrists.

Authors:  Eun Joo Yang; Seung Hyun Chung; Jae-Yong Jeon; Kwan Sik Seo; Hyung-Ik Shin; Ji Hye Hwang; Jae-Young Lim
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 4.679

9.  Equine-assisted interventions for veterans with service-related health conditions: a systematic mapping review.

Authors:  Adam R Kinney; Aaron M Eakman; Rebecca Lassell; Wendy Wood
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2019-08-29

10.  Foot-ankle functional outcomes of using the Diabetic Foot Guidance System (SOPeD) for people with diabetic neuropathy: a feasibility study for the single-blind randomized controlled FOotCAre (FOCA) trial I.

Authors:  Ronaldo H Cruvinel Júnior; Jane S S P Ferreira; Raquel I Beteli; Érica Q Silva; Jady L Veríssimo; Renan L Monteiro; Eneida Y Suda; Isabel C N Sacco
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2021-03-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.