Literature DB >> 18524977

Fracture detection in the cervical spine with multidetector CT: 1-mm versus 3-mm axial images.

P M Phal1, L P Riccelli, P Wang, G M Nesbit, J C Anderson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Multidetector CT imaging of the cervical spine performed with submillimeter collimation allows for the production of excellent quality multiplanar reformations and reconstructed axial images at any chosen section thickness. Currently there is no consensus on what images need to be reviewed for accurate diagnosis of cervical spine fractures. Our study assesses whether 1-mm axial images provide any diagnostic advantage over 3-mm images in detection of cervical spine fractures when read in conjunction with multiplanar reformations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The dataset consisted 50 cases of CT of the cervical spine and included 25 consecutive cases of cervical spine fractures and 25 matched normal CTs. Axial images were reconstructed at 1- and 3-mm thicknesses, and the sagittal and coronal reformations between 2- and 3-mm thicknesses. Four radiologists reviewed all 50 of the cases twice, once at 1 mm and once at 3 mm. Reads were separated by 3 months.
RESULTS: There were 39 fractures in total, consisting of 29 clinically significant and 10 insignificant fractures. Thirty-three fractures were missed in 400 reads. Twenty-one misses were at 3 mm (sensitivity, 86%), and 12 misses at 1 mm (sensitivity, 92%; P = .228). Ten of 33 misses were of clinically significant fractures, 6 misses at 1 mm and 4 at 3 mm (P = .52). Twenty-three of 33 misses were of clinically insignificant fractures, 6 at 1 mm and 17 at 3 mm (P = .006).
CONCLUSION: For detection of clinically important fractures, there is no significant difference between 1- and 3-mm axial images when read in conjunction with multiplanar reformations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18524977      PMCID: PMC8119067          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  24 in total

1.  Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group.

Authors:  J R Hoffman; W R Mower; A B Wolfson; K H Todd; M I Zucker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-07-13       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  ROC-type assessments of medical imaging and CAD technologies: a perspective.

Authors:  David Gur
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  From the laboratory to the clinic: the "prevalence effect".

Authors:  David Gur; Howard E Rockette; Thomas Warfel; Joan M Lacomis; Carl R Fuhrman
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 4.  Multi-detector row CT systems and image-reconstruction techniques.

Authors:  Thomas G Flohr; Stefan Schaller; Karl Stierstorfer; Herbert Bruder; Bernd M Ohnesorge; U Joseph Schoepf
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Limitations of cervical radiography in the evaluation of acute cervical trauma.

Authors:  J H Woodring; C Lee
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1993-01

Review 6.  Cervical spine clearance: a review.

Authors:  Paula J Richards
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.586

7.  The misdiagnosis of acute cervical spine injuries and fractures in infants and children: the 12-year experience of a level I pediatric and adult trauma center.

Authors:  Anthony M Avellino; Fred A Mann; M Sean Grady; Jens R Chapman; Richard G Ellenbogen; Tord D Alden; Sohail K Mirza
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2004-12-18       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  Litigation of missed cervical spine injuries in patients presenting with blunt traumatic injury.

Authors:  Gregory P Lekovic; Timothy R Harrington
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Value of multiplanar reformations (MPR) in multidetector CT (MDCT) of acute vertebral fractures: do we still have to read the transverse images?

Authors:  Philipp G C Begemann; Jörn Kemper; Christian Gatzka; Alexander Stork; Claus Nolte-Ernsting; Gerhard Adam
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Four-channel multidetector CT in facial fractures: do we need 2 x 0.5 mm collimation?

Authors:  Marcel O Philipp; Martin A Funovics; Frederick A Mann; Andreas M Herneth; Michael H Fuchsjaeger; Florian Grabenwoeger; Gerhard Lechner; Viktor M Metz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  [Imaging of trauma with multi-detector computed tomography].

Authors:  M Körner; M Reiser; U Linsenmaier
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Comparison of thick- and thin-slice images in thoracoabdominal trauma CT: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Leon Guchlerner; Julian Lukas Wichmann; Patricia Tischendorf; Moritz Albrecht; Thomas Josef Vogl; Sebastian Wutzler; Hanns Ackermann; Katrin Eichler; Claudia Frellesen
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  Pitfalls in multidetector computed tomography imaging of traumatic spinal injuries.

Authors:  Jenn Nee Khoo; Le Roy Chong; Elizabeth Hui-Ying Chan; Angeline Choo-Choo Poh
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2011-07-06

4.  Technical aspects of CT imaging of the spine.

Authors:  Bernhard Tins
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2010-10-21

5.  Highly reduced-dose CT of the lumbar spine in a human cadaver model.

Authors:  Malte Lennart Warncke; Nis Jesper Wiese; Enver Tahir; Susanne Sehner; Axel Heinemann; Marc Regier; Klaus Püschel; Gerhard Adam; Julius Matthias Weinrich; Azien Laqmani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.