Literature DB >> 14626308

From the laboratory to the clinic: the "prevalence effect".

David Gur1, Howard E Rockette, Thomas Warfel, Joan M Lacomis, Carl R Fuhrman.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2003        PMID： 14626308     DOI： 10.1016/s1076-6332(03)00466-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN： 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review: bias in imaging studies - the effect of manipulating clinical context, recall bias and reporting intensity.

Authors:  Darren Boone; Steve Halligan; Susan Mallett; Stuart A Taylor; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Cognitive psychology: rare items often missed in visual searches.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Todd S Horowitz; Naomi M Kenner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The prevalence effect in a laboratory environment: Changing the confidence ratings.

Authors:  David Gur; Andriy I Bandos; Carl R Fuhrman; Amy H Klym; Jill L King; Howard E Rockette
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Impact of prevalence and case distribution in lab-based diagnostic imaging studies.

Authors:  Brandon D Gallas; Weijie Chen; Elodia Cole; Robert Ochs; Nicholas Petrick; Etta D Pisano; Berkman Sahiner; Frank W Samuelson; Kyle J Myers
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-01-21

5.  Intercountry analysis of breast density classification using visual grading.

Authors:  Christine N Damases; Peter Hogg; Mark F McEntee
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  The Reproducibility of Changes in Diagnostic Figures of Merit Across Laboratory and Clinical Imaging Reader Studies.

Authors:  Frank W Samuelson; Craig K Abbey
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Assessing the effect of a true-positive recall case in screening mammography: does perceptual priming alter radiologists' performance?

Authors:  S J Lewis; C R Mello-Thoms; P C Brennan; W Lee; A Tan; M F McEntee; M Evanoff; M Pietrzyk; W M Reed
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Fracture detection in the cervical spine with multidetector CT: 1-mm versus 3-mm axial images.

Authors:  P M Phal; L P Riccelli; P Wang; G M Nesbit; J C Anderson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 3.825
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.