Leon Guchlerner1, Julian Lukas Wichmann2, Patricia Tischendorf2, Moritz Albrecht2, Thomas Josef Vogl2, Sebastian Wutzler3, Hanns Ackermann4, Katrin Eichler2, Claudia Frellesen2. 1. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Institut fuer Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Clinic of the Goethe University, Haus 23C UG, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. leon.guchlerner@gmail.com. 2. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Institut fuer Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Clinic of the Goethe University, Haus 23C UG, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 3. Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Clinic of the Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany. 4. Department of Biostatistics and Mathematical Modelling, Clinic of the Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare thick (5 mm) and thin slice images (1.5 mm) of lung, soft tissue, and bone window in thoracoabdominal trauma computed tomography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 167 Patients that underwent thoracoabdominal trauma CT between November 2014 and December 2015 were included in the study. CT data were reconstructed in a transverse direction with 5 mm and 1.5 mm slice images of lung, soft tissue, and bone window. Two blinded raters (radiologists) evaluated the collected data by detecting predefined injuries in different organ areas. Reconstruction and evaluation times as well as detected injuries were noted and compared. RESULTS: Reconstruction and evaluation times were significantly higher with 1.5 mm thin-slice images, and the effect strength according to Rosenthal displayed a strong effect of 0.61 (< 0.1 small effect, 0.3 middle effect, and > 0.5 strong effect). Average evaluation time differences were 62.7 s (33.9 s-91.5 s) in bone window between 1.5 mm and 3 mm for rater 1 (p < 0.001) and 71.4 s (43.1 s-99.7 s) for rater 2 (p < 0.001). Average time differences between 1.5 mm and 5 mm were 68,7 s (43.9 s-93.5 s) for rater 1 and 75.3 s (44.7 s-105.9 s) for rater 2 in lung window (p < 0.001) and 66.6 s (28.8 s-104.4 s) for rater 1 and 114 s (74.4 s-153.6 s) for rater 2 in soft-tissue window (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference regarding soft-tissue and lung injuries, except non-significant improvement in the detection of bone fractures. CONCLUSION: Thin-slice images do not bring any significant benefit in thoracoabdominal trauma CT of soft-tissue and lung injuries, but they can be helpful for the diagnosis of bone fractures and incidental findings.
PURPOSE: To compare thick (5 mm) and thin slice images (1.5 mm) of lung, soft tissue, and bone window in thoracoabdominal trauma computed tomography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 167 Patients that underwent thoracoabdominal trauma CT between November 2014 and December 2015 were included in the study. CT data were reconstructed in a transverse direction with 5 mm and 1.5 mm slice images of lung, soft tissue, and bone window. Two blinded raters (radiologists) evaluated the collected data by detecting predefined injuries in different organ areas. Reconstruction and evaluation times as well as detected injuries were noted and compared. RESULTS: Reconstruction and evaluation times were significantly higher with 1.5 mm thin-slice images, and the effect strength according to Rosenthal displayed a strong effect of 0.61 (< 0.1 small effect, 0.3 middle effect, and > 0.5 strong effect). Average evaluation time differences were 62.7 s (33.9 s-91.5 s) in bone window between 1.5 mm and 3 mm for rater 1 (p < 0.001) and 71.4 s (43.1 s-99.7 s) for rater 2 (p < 0.001). Average time differences between 1.5 mm and 5 mm were 68,7 s (43.9 s-93.5 s) for rater 1 and 75.3 s (44.7 s-105.9 s) for rater 2 in lung window (p < 0.001) and 66.6 s (28.8 s-104.4 s) for rater 1 and 114 s (74.4 s-153.6 s) for rater 2 in soft-tissue window (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference regarding soft-tissue and lung injuries, except non-significant improvement in the detection of bone fractures. CONCLUSION: Thin-slice images do not bring any significant benefit in thoracoabdominal trauma CT of soft-tissue and lung injuries, but they can be helpful for the diagnosis of bone fractures and incidental findings.
Authors: David Gur; Andriy I Bandos; Carl R Fuhrman; Amy H Klym; Jill L King; Howard E Rockette Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Katrin Eichler; Ingo Marzi; Hendrik Wyen; Stephan Zangos; Martin G Mack; Thomas J Vogl Journal: Clin Imaging Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 1.605
Authors: C Herzog; H Ahle; M G Mack; B Maier; W Schwarz; S Zangos; V Jacobi; A Thalhammer; J Peters; H Ackermann; T J Vogl Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2004-08-05 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Mark M Hammer; Eric Flagg; Vincent M Mellnick; Kristopher W Cummings; Sanjeev Bhalla; Constantine A Raptis Journal: Emerg Radiol Date: 2013-10-19
Authors: Teun P Saltzherr; P H Ping Fung Kon Jin; Fred C Bakker; Kees J Ponsen; Jan S K Luitse; Mark Scholing; Georgios F Giannakopoulos; Ludo F M Beenen; C Pieter Henny; Ger M Koole; Hans B Reitsma; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Patrick M M Bossuyt; J Carel Goslings Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2008-08-22