Literature DB >> 18522913

Kin in space: social viscosity in a spatially and genetically substructured network.

Jochen B W Wolf1, Fritz Trillmich.   

Abstract

Population substructuring is a fundamental aspect of animal societies. A growing number of theoretical studies recognize that who-meets-whom is not random, but rather determined by spatial relationships or illustrated by social networks. Structural properties of large highly dynamic social systems are notoriously difficult to unravel. Network approaches provide powerful ways to analyse the intricate relationships between social behaviour, dispersal strategies and genetic structure. Applying network analytical tools to a colony of the highly gregarious Galápagos sea lion (Zalophus wollebaeki), we find several genetic clusters that correspond to spatially determined 'network communities'. Overall relatedness was low, and genetic structure in the network can be interpreted as an emergent property of philopatry and seems not to be primarily driven by targeted interactions among highly related individuals in family groups. Nevertheless, social relationships between directly adjacent individuals in the network were stronger among genetically more similar individuals. Taken together, these results suggest that even small differences in the degree of relatedness can influence behavioural decisions. This raises the fascinating prospect that kin selection may also apply to low levels of relatedness within densely packed animal groups where less obvious co-operative interactions such as increased tolerance and stress reduction are important.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18522913      PMCID: PMC2603206          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  25 in total

Review 1.  MHC peptides and the sensory evaluation of genotype.

Authors:  Thomas Boehm; Frank Zufall
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 13.837

2.  A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks.

Authors:  Hisashi Ohtsuki; Christoph Hauert; Erez Lieberman; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Evolution of cooperation in a finite homogeneous graph.

Authors:  Peter D Taylor; Troy Day; Geoff Wild
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Self-structuring in spatial evolutionary ecology.

Authors:  Sébastien Lion; Minus van Baalen
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 9.492

5.  Population genetics meets behavioral ecology.

Authors:  D W Sugg; R K Chesser; F Stephen Dobson; J L Hoogland
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I.

Authors:  W D Hamilton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations.

Authors:  T C Marshall; J Slate; L E Kruuk; J M Pemberton
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  Islands in the sea: extreme female natal site fidelity in the Australian sea lion, Neophoca cinerea.

Authors:  R A Campbell; N J Gales; G M Lento; C S Baker
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Genetic dissimilarity predicts paternity in the smooth newt (Lissotriton vulgaris).

Authors:  Robert Jehle; Marc Sztatecsny; Jochen B W Wolf; April Whitlock; Walter Hödl; Terry Burke
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Beyond habitat requirements: individual fine-scale site fidelity in a colony of the Galapagos sea lion (Zalophus wollebaeki) creates conditions for social structuring.

Authors:  Jochen B W Wolf; Fritz Trillmich
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 3.298

View more
  14 in total

1.  Chemical fingerprints reveal clues to identity, heterozygosity, and relatedness.

Authors:  Benjamin J Pitcher; Isabelle Charrier; Robert G Harcourt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Sexual networks: measuring sexual selection in structured, polyandrous populations.

Authors:  Grant C McDonald; Richard James; Jens Krause; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Group structure predicts variation in proximity relationships between male-female and male-infant pairs of mountain gorillas (Gorilla beringei beringei).

Authors:  S Rosenbaum; A A Maldonado-Chaparro; T S Stoinski
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 2.163

4.  Split between two worlds: automated sensing reveals links between above- and belowground social networks in a free-living mammal.

Authors:  Jennifer E Smith; Denisse A Gamboa; Julia M Spencer; Sarah J Travenick; Chelsea A Ortiz; Riana D Hunter; Andy Sih
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Strength of social tie predicts cooperative investment in a human social network.

Authors:  Freya Harrison; James Sciberras; Richard James
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Tracing early stages of species differentiation: ecological, morphological and genetic divergence of Galápagos sea lion populations.

Authors:  Jochen B W Wolf; Chris Harrod; Sylvia Brunner; Sandie Salazar; Fritz Trillmich; Diethard Tautz
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 3.260

Review 7.  Networks and the ecology of parasite transmission: A framework for wildlife parasitology.

Authors:  Stephanie S Godfrey
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.674

8.  Long-lasting, kin-directed female interactions in a spatially structured wild boar social network.

Authors:  Tomasz Podgórski; David Lusseau; Massimo Scandura; Leif Sönnichsen; Bogumiła Jędrzejewska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Modelling animal group fission using social network dynamics.

Authors:  Cédric Sueur; Anaïs Maire
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Cooperative investment in public goods is kin directed in communal nests of social birds.

Authors:  René E van Dijk; Jennifer C Kaden; Araceli Argüelles-Ticó; Deborah A Dawson; Terry Burke; Ben J Hatchwell
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 9.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.