Literature DB >> 18521621

Assessment of voluntary muscle activation using magnetic stimulation.

Thomas D O'Brien1, Neil D Reeves, Vasilios Baltzopoulos, David A Jones, Constantinos N Maganaris.   

Abstract

The present study investigated the applicability of magnetic stimulation (MS) for estimating activation capacity. Ten men performed isometric knee extensions at 95% of maximum voluntary contraction level on two testing sessions. MS and electrical stimulation (ES) were applied by placing the coil and stimulating electrodes, respectively, on the quadriceps muscle group. In session 1, MS and ES were applied to allow a comparison between the two stimulating devices. During session 2, MS was applied again to assess the reproducibility of MS measurements. Activation level was estimated with the interpolated twitch technique (ITT) and the central activation ratio (CAR). Activation level determined with MS was highly repeatable, but was only comparable to ES when using ITT (standard error < 1.45%, mean difference < 0.63%, for all). MS with CAR overestimated activation by 3% compared to ES (standard error = 1.13%, mean difference = 2.76%) because the power of the magnetic field was limited. These results indicate that MS is a promising tool for reliable and valid quantification of activation levels when using the ITT approach and potentially suitable for studies involving children or other subjects where the pain of conventional ES is a problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18521621     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-008-0782-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  20 in total

1.  Transcutaneous magnetic stimulation of the quadriceps via the femoral nerve.

Authors:  Ian J Kremenic; S Simon Ben-Avi; Dan Leonhardt; Malachy P McHugh
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.217

2.  Muscle activation assessment: effects of method, stimulus number, and joint angle.

Authors:  Theodoros M Bampouras; Neil D Reeves; Vasilios Baltzopoulos; Constantinos N Maganaris
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.217

3.  Assessment of the voluntary activation of the diaphragm using cervical and cortical magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  T Similowski; A Duguet; C Straus; V Attali; D Boisteanu; J P Derenne
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 16.671

4.  Comparison of interpolation and central activation ratios as measures of muscle inactivation.

Authors:  D Behm; K Power; E Drinkwater
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.217

5.  Knee extensor strength, activation, and size in very elderly people following strength training.

Authors:  S D Harridge; A Kryger; A Stensgaard
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.217

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Calf muscle-tendon properties and postural balance in old age.

Authors:  Gladys L Onambele; Marco V Narici; Constantinos N Maganaris
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2006-02-02

8.  Quadriceps muscle weakness following acute hemiplegic stroke.

Authors:  M L Harris; M I Polkey; P M Bath; J Moxham
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.477

9.  Intermuscle differences in activation.

Authors:  D G Behm; J Whittle; D Button; K Power
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.217

10.  Reproducible measurement of voluntary activation of human elbow flexors with motor cortical stimulation.

Authors:  Gabrielle Todd; Janet L Taylor; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2004-03-19
View more
  7 in total

1.  Magnetic versus electrical stimulation in the interpolation twitch technique of elbow flexors.

Authors:  Sofia I Lampropoulou; Alexander V Nowicky; Louise Marston
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Electrode type and placement configuration for quadriceps activation evaluation.

Authors:  Brian G Pietrosimone; Noelle M Selkow; Christopher D Ingersoll; Joseph M Hart; Susan A Saliba
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 3.  Electrical stimulation for testing neuromuscular function: from sport to pathology.

Authors:  Guillaume Y Millet; Vincent Martin; Alain Martin; Samuel Vergès
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Evoked tetanic torque and activation level explain strength differences by side.

Authors:  Chandramouli Krishnan; Glenn N Williams
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-04-26       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  The effects of agonist and antagonist muscle activation on the knee extension moment-angle relationship in adults and children.

Authors:  Thomas D O'Brien; Neil D Reeves; Vasilios Baltzopoulos; David A Jones; Constantinos N Maganaris
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Mechanisms of quadriceps muscle weakness in knee joint osteoarthritis: the effects of prolonged vibration on torque and muscle activation in osteoarthritic and healthy control subjects.

Authors:  David A Rice; Peter J McNair; Gwyn N Lewis
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 5.156

7.  Prediction of Force Recruitment of Neuromuscular Magnetic Stimulation From 3D Field Model of the Thigh.

Authors:  Stefan Goetz; Joerg Kammermann; Florian Helling; Thomas Weyh; Zhongxi Li
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.528

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.