Literature DB >> 24150083

Magnetic versus electrical stimulation in the interpolation twitch technique of elbow flexors.

Sofia I Lampropoulou1, Alexander V Nowicky, Louise Marston.   

Abstract

The study compared peripheral magnetic with electrical stimulation of the biceps brachii m. (BB) in the single pulse Interpolation Twitch Technique (ITT). 14 healthy participants (31±7 years) participated in a within-subjects repeated-measures design study. Single, constant-current electrical and magnetic stimuli were delivered over the motor point of BB with supramaximal intensity (20% above maximum) at rest and at various levels of voluntary contraction. Force measurements from right elbow isometric flexion and muscle electromyograms (EMG) from the BB, the triceps brachii m. (TB) and the abductor pollicis brevis m. (APB) were obtained. The twitch forces at rest and maximal contractions, the twitch force-voluntary force relationship, the M-waves and the voluntary activation (VA) of BB between magnetic and electrical stimulation were compared. The mean amplitude of the twitches evoked at MVC was not significantly different between electrical (0.62 ± 0.49 N) and magnetic (0.81 ± 0.49 N) stimulation (p > 0.05), and the maximum VA of BB was comparable between electrical (95%) and magnetic (93%) stimulation (p > 0. 05). No differences (p >0.05) were revealed in the BB M-waves between electrical (13.47 ± 0.49 mV.ms) and magnetic (12.61 ± 0.58 mV.ms) stimulation. The TB M-waves were also similar (p > 0.05) but electrically evoked APB M-waves were significantly larger than those evoked by magnetic stimulation (p < 0.05). The twitch-voluntary force relationship over the range of MVCs was best described by non-linear functions for both electrical and magnetic stimulation. The electrically evoked resting twitches were consistently larger in amplitude than the magnetically evoked ones (mean difference 3.1 ± 3.34 N, p < 0.05). Reduction of the inter-electrodes distance reduced the twitch amplitude by 6.5 ± 6.2 N (p < 0.05). The fundamental similarities in voluntary activation assessment of BB with peripheral electrical and magnetic stimulation point towards a promising new application of peripheral magnetic stimulation as an alternative to the conventional ITT for the assessment of BB voluntary activation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electrical stimulation; elbow flexors.; interpolation twitch technique; magnetic stimulation; voluntary activation

Year:  2012        PMID: 24150083      PMCID: PMC3763319     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  43 in total

1.  Anterior magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation: laboratory and clinical evaluation.

Authors:  M I Polkey; A Duguet; Y Luo; P D Hughes; N Hart; C H Hamnegård; M Green; T Similowski; J Moxham
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Statistical analysis of correlated data using generalized estimating equations: an orientation.

Authors:  James A Hanley; Abdissa Negassa; Michael D deB Edwardes; Janet E Forrester
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Voluntary strength and fatigue.

Authors:  P A MERTON
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1954-03-29       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Transcutaneous magnetic stimulation of the quadriceps via the femoral nerve.

Authors:  Ian J Kremenic; S Simon Ben-Avi; Dan Leonhardt; Malachy P McHugh
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.217

5.  Comparison of electric and magnetic coil stimulation in the supraclavicular region.

Authors:  D Cros; S Gominak; B Shahani; J Fang; B Day
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.217

6.  Twitch interpolation of the elbow flexor muscles at high forces.

Authors:  G M Allen; D K McKenzie; S C Gandevia
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.217

7.  Muscle inactivation: assessment of interpolated twitch technique.

Authors:  D G Behm; D M St-Pierre; D Perez
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1996-11

8.  Quantitation of central activation failure during maximal voluntary contractions in humans.

Authors:  J A Kent-Braun; R Le Blanc
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.217

9.  Quadriceps muscle weakness following acute hemiplegic stroke.

Authors:  M L Harris; M I Polkey; P M Bath; J Moxham
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.477

10.  Reproducible measurement of voluntary activation of human elbow flexors with motor cortical stimulation.

Authors:  Gabrielle Todd; Janet L Taylor; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2004-03-19
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Determining the potential sites of neural adaptation to cross-education: implications for the cross-education of muscle strength.

Authors:  Ashlyn K Frazer; Alan J Pearce; Glyn Howatson; Kevin Thomas; Stuart Goodall; Dawson J Kidgell
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  The effect of paired corticospinal-motoneuronal stimulation on maximal voluntary elbow flexion in cervical spinal cord injury: an experimental study.

Authors:  Siobhan C Dongés; Claire L Boswell-Ruys; Jane E Butler; Janet L Taylor
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 3.  On the reliability and validity of central fatigue determination.

Authors:  Raffy Dotan; Stacey Woods; Paola Contessa
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Does sonification of action simulation training impact corticospinal excitability and audiomotor plasticity?

Authors:  Fabio Castro; Ladan Osman; Giovanni Di Pino; Aleksandra Vuckovic; Alexander Nowicky; Daniel Bishop
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.