Literature DB >> 21590274

Electrical stimulation for testing neuromuscular function: from sport to pathology.

Guillaume Y Millet1, Vincent Martin, Alain Martin, Samuel Vergès.   

Abstract

The use of electrical stimulation (ES) can contribute to our knowledge of how our neuromuscular system can adapt to physical stress or unloading. Although it has been recently challenged, the standard technique used to explore central modifications is the twitch interpolated method which consists in superimposing single twitches or high-frequency doublets on a maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and to compare the superimposed response to the potentiated response obtained from the relaxed muscle. Alternative methods consist in (1) superimposing a train of stimuli (central activation ratio), (2) comparing the MVC response to the force evoked by a high-frequency tetanus or (3) examining the change in maximal EMG response during voluntary contractions, if this variable is normalized to the maximal M wave, i.e. EMG response to a single stimulus. ES is less used to examine supraspinal factors but it is useful for investigating changes at the spinal level, either by using H reflexes, F waves or cervicomedullary motor-evoked potentials. Peripheral changes can be examined with ES, usually by stimulating the muscle in the relaxed state. Neuromuscular propagation of action potentials on the sarcolemma (M wave, high-frequency fatigue), excitation-contraction coupling (e.g. low-frequency fatigue) and intrinsic force (high-frequency stimulation at supramaximal intensity) can all be used to non-invasively explore muscular function with ES. As for all indirect methods, there are limitations and these are discussed in this review. Finally, (1) ES as a method to measure respiratory muscle function and (2) the comparison between electrical and magnetic stimulation will also be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21590274     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-011-1996-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  118 in total

1.  Effects of activity on axonal excitability: implications for motor control studies.

Authors:  David Burke
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Time course of neuromuscular alterations during a prolonged running exercise.

Authors:  Nicolas Place; Romuald Lepers; Gaëlle Deley; Guillaume Y Millet
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 3.  Training adaptations in the behavior of human motor units.

Authors:  Jacques Duchateau; John G Semmler; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2006-06-22

4.  Increased H-reflex excitability is not accompanied by changes in neural drive following 24 days of unilateral lower limb suspension.

Authors:  Olivier R Seynnes; Nicola A Maffiuletti; Astrid M Horstman; Marco V Narici
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.217

5.  Muscle inactivation: assessment of interpolated twitch technique.

Authors:  D G Behm; D M St-Pierre; D Perez
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1996-11

6.  Impaired response of human motoneurones to corticospinal stimulation after voluntary exercise.

Authors:  S C Gandevia; N Petersen; J E Butler; J L Taylor
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Detection of diaphragmatic fatigue in man by phrenic stimulation.

Authors:  M Aubier; G Farkas; A De Troyer; R Mozes; C Roussos
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1981-03

8.  Contractile properties of the human diaphragm during chronic hyperinflation.

Authors:  T Similowski; S Yan; A P Gauthier; P T Macklem; F Bellemare
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-09-26       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Torque-based triggering improves stimulus timing precision in activation tests.

Authors:  Chandramouli Krishnan; Eric J Allen; Glenn N Williams
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.217

10.  Combined in situ analysis of metabolic and myoelectrical changes associated with electrically induced fatigue.

Authors:  J L Darques; D Bendahan; M Roussel; B Giannesini; F Tagliarini; Y Le Fur; P J Cozzone; Y Jammes
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2003-06-20
View more
  47 in total

1.  Alteration in neuromuscular function after a 5 km running time trial.

Authors:  O Girard; G P Millet; J-P Micallef; S Racinais
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Assessment of Neuromuscular Function Using Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation.

Authors:  Vianney Rozand; Sidney Grosprêtre; Paul J Stapley; Romuald Lepers
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-09-13       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Recruitment order of quadriceps motor units: femoral nerve vs. direct quadriceps stimulation.

Authors:  Javier Rodriguez-Falces; Nicolas Place
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation intensity over the tibial nerve trunk on triceps surae muscle fatigue.

Authors:  Aude-Clémence M Doix; Boris Matkowski; Alain Martin; Karin Roeleveld; Serge S Colson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Magnetic versus electrical stimulation in the interpolation twitch technique of elbow flexors.

Authors:  Sofia I Lampropoulou; Alexander V Nowicky; Louise Marston
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  Electrical stimulation for neuromuscular testing and training: state-of-the art and unresolved issues.

Authors:  Nicola A Maffiuletti; Marco A Minetto; Dario Farina; Roberto Bottinelli
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Comparison of electrical nerve stimulation, electrical muscle stimulation and magnetic nerve stimulation to assess the neuromuscular function of the plantar flexor muscles.

Authors:  Daria Neyroud; John Temesi; Guillaume Y Millet; Samuel Verges; Nicola A Maffiuletti; Bengt Kayser; Nicolas Place
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Cortical voluntary activation testing methodology impacts central fatigue.

Authors:  José Mira; Thomas Lapole; Robin Souron; Laurent Messonnier; Guillaume Y Millet; Thomas Rupp
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Different recoveries of the first and second phases of the M-wave after intermittent maximal voluntary contractions.

Authors:  Javier Rodriguez-Falces; Nicolas Place
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Short vs. long pulses for testing knee extensor neuromuscular properties: does it matter?

Authors:  Caroline Giroux; Boris Roduit; Javier Rodriguez-Falces; Jacques Duchateau; Nicola A Maffiuletti; Nicolas Place
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.