Literature DB >> 18515479

Rapid ultrafiltration concentration and biosensor detection of enterococci from large volumes of Florida recreational water.

Stephaney D Leskinen1, Daniel V Lim.   

Abstract

Monitoring recreational waters for fecal contamination by standard methodologies involves culturing indicator bacteria, such as fecal coliforms and enterococci. Delayed reporting of microbial water quality parameters increases the likelihood of public exposure to pathogens of fecal origin, making the development of rapid methods important for public health protection. A rapid assay for enterococci was developed using a combined ultrafiltration-biosensor procedure. Twelve 100-liter water samples were collected from upper Tampa Bay over a 9-month period. The samples were collected on site by dead-end hollow-fiber ultrafiltration. Postfiltration processing of the initial retentates included sonication and micrometer-level sieve passage to remove interfering particles. Centrifugation was utilized for secondary concentration. Grab samples were collected simultaneously with the ultrafiltered samples. Concentrations of enterococci in all grab and ultrafiltration samples were determined by the standard method (EPA method 1600) for calculation of recovery efficiencies and concentration factors. Levels of enterococci increased twofold in initial retentates and by 4 orders of magnitude in final retentates over ambient concentrations. An aliquot of each final retentate was adsorbed onto polystyrene waveguides for immunoassay analysis of enterococci with a microfluidic fiber optic biosensor, the Raptor. Enterococci were detected when concentrations in the ambient water exceeded the regulatory standard for a single sample (> or =105 CFU/100 ml). The combined ultrafiltration-biosensor procedure required 2.5 h for detection compared to 24 for the standard method. This study demonstrated that enterococci can be detected rapidly using on-site ultrafiltration, secondary concentration, and biosensor analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18515479      PMCID: PMC2519343          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00052-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  34 in total

1.  Multi-analyte interrogation using the fiber optic biosensor.

Authors:  G P Anderson; K D King; K L Gaffney; L H Johnson
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 10.618

2.  Detection of smallpox virus DNA by LightCycler PCR.

Authors:  Mark J Espy; Franklin R Cockerill III; Richard F Meyer; Michael D Bowen; Gregory A Poland; Ted L Hadfield; Thomas F Smith
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of Enterococcus measurements in freshwater at two recreational beaches by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and membrane filter culture analysis.

Authors:  Richard A Haugland; Shawn C Siefring; Larry J Wymer; Kristen P Brenner; Alfred P Dufour
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2004-12-24       Impact factor: 11.236

4.  Validity of the indicator organism paradigm for pathogen reduction in reclaimed water and public health protection.

Authors:  Valerie J Harwood; Audrey D Levine; Troy M Scott; Vasanta Chivukula; Jerzy Lukasik; Samuel R Farrah; Joan B Rose
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Persistence and differential survival of fecal indicator bacteria in subtropical waters and sediments.

Authors:  Kimberly L Anderson; John E Whitlock; Valerie J Harwood
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in 10- and 25-gram ground beef samples with an evanescent-wave biosensor with silica and polystyrene waveguides.

Authors:  Daniel R Demarco; Daniel V Lim
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.077

7.  Hollow-fiber ultrafiltration of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts from a wide variety of 10-L surface water samples.

Authors:  Ryan C Kuhn; Kevin H Oshima
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Automated concentration and recovery of micro-organisms from drinking water using dead-end ultrafiltration.

Authors:  E A Kearns; S Magaña; D V Lim
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 3.772

9.  Ultrafiltration-based techniques for rapid and simultaneous concentration of multiple microbe classes from 100-L tap water samples.

Authors:  Amy L Polaczyk; Jothikumar Narayanan; Theresa L Cromeans; Donghyun Hahn; Jacqueline M Roberts; James E Amburgey; Vincent R Hill
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 2.363

10.  Direct PCR detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7.

Authors:  K A Fode-Vaughan; J S Maki; J A Benson; M L P Collins
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.858

View more
  14 in total

1.  Hollow-fiber ultrafiltration and PCR detection of human-associated genetic markers from various types of surface water in Florida.

Authors:  Stephaney D Leskinen; Miriam Brownell; Daniel V Lim; Valerie J Harwood
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  A novel screening method for competitive FRET-aptamers applied to E. coli assay development.

Authors:  John G Bruno; Maria P Carrillo; Taylor Phillips; Carrie J Andrews
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 2.217

3.  Dead-end hollow-fiber ultrafiltration for recovery of diverse microbes from water.

Authors:  Carmela M Smith; Vincent R Hill
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Improving Salmonella determination in Sinaloa rivers with ultrafiltration and most probable number methods.

Authors:  Maribel Jimenez; Cristobal Chaidez
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Dead-end hollow-fiber ultrafiltration for concentration and enumeration of Escherichia coli and broad-host-range plasmid DNA from wastewater.

Authors:  Kyle L Asfahl; Mary C Savin
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 2.363

6.  Effectiveness of two wastewater disinfection strategies for the removal of fecal indicator bacteria, bacteriophage, and enteric viral pathogens concentrated using dead-end hollow fiber ultrafiltration (D-HFUF).

Authors:  Asja Korajkic; Julie Kelleher; Orin C Shanks; Michael P Herrmann; Brian R McMinn
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 10.753

7.  Recovery of diverse microbes in high turbidity surface water samples using dead-end ultrafiltration.

Authors:  Bonnie Mull; Vincent R Hill
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 2.363

Review 8.  Evanescent wave fluorescence biosensors: Advances of the last decade.

Authors:  Chris Rowe Taitt; George P Anderson; Frances S Ligler
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 10.618

9.  Antibody-based sensors: principles, problems and potential for detection of pathogens and associated toxins.

Authors:  Barry Byrne; Edwina Stack; Niamh Gilmartin; Richard O'Kennedy
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 10.  Recent developments in detection and enumeration of waterborne bacteria: a retrospective minireview.

Authors:  Rehan A Deshmukh; Kopal Joshi; Sunil Bhand; Utpal Roy
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2016-07-10       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.