Literature DB >> 18515263

Positive and negative selection on noncoding DNA in Drosophila simulans.

Penelope R Haddrill1, Doris Bachtrog, Peter Andolfatto.   

Abstract

There is now a wealth of evidence that some of the most important regions of the genome are found outside those that encode proteins, and noncoding regions of the genome have been shown to be subject to substantial levels of selective constraint, particularly in Drosophila. Recent work has suggested that these regions may also have been subject to the action of positive selection, with large fractions of noncoding divergence having been driven to fixation by adaptive evolution. However, this work has focused on Drosophila melanogaster, which is thought to have experienced a reduction in effective population size (N(e)), and thus a reduction in the efficacy of selection, compared with its closest relative Drosophila simulans. Here, we examine patterns of evolution at several classes of noncoding DNA in D. simulans and find that all noncoding DNA is subject to the action of negative selection, indicated by reduced levels of polymorphism and divergence and a skew in the frequency spectrum toward rare variants. We find that the signature of negative selection on noncoding DNA and nonsynonymous sites is obscured to some extent by purifying selection acting on preferred to unpreferred synonymous codon mutations. We investigate the extent to which divergence in noncoding DNA is inferred to be the product of positive selection and to what extent these inferences depend on selection on synonymous sites and demography. Based on patterns of polymorphism and divergence for different classes of synonymous substitution, we find the divergence excess inferred in noncoding DNA and nonsynonymous sites in the D. simulans lineage difficult to reconcile with demographic explanations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18515263      PMCID: PMC2734132          DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msn125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  59 in total

1.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Selection, recombination and demographic history in Drosophila miranda.

Authors:  Doris Bachtrog; Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-10-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  Multilocus patterns of nucleotide variability and the demographic and selection history of Drosophila melanogaster populations.

Authors:  Penelope R Haddrill; Kevin R Thornton; Brian Charlesworth; Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Testing the neutral theory of molecular evolution with genomic data from Drosophila.

Authors:  Justin C Fay; Gerald J Wyckoff; Chung-I Wu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila.

Authors:  Nick G C Smith; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  African Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans populations have similar levels of sequence variability, suggesting comparable effective population sizes.

Authors:  Viola Nolte; Christian Schlötterer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA.

Authors:  H Akashi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  The genomic rate of adaptive amino acid substitution in Drosophila.

Authors:  Nicolas Bierne; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2004-03-24       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Reduced efficacy of selection in regions of the Drosophila genome that lack crossing over.

Authors:  Penelope R Haddrill; Daniel L Halligan; Dimitris Tomaras; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  63 in total

1.  Reshaping of global gene expression networks and sex-biased gene expression by integration of a young gene.

Authors:  Sidi Chen; Xiaochun Ni; Benjamin H Krinsky; Yong E Zhang; Maria D Vibranovski; Kevin P White; Manyuan Long
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Estimating the rate of adaptive molecular evolution when the evolutionary divergence between species is small.

Authors:  Peter D Keightley; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Allelic imbalance in Drosophila hybrid heads: exons, isoforms, and evolution.

Authors:  R M Graze; L L Novelo; V Amin; J M Fear; G Casella; S V Nuzhdin; L M McIntyre
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Evidence for widespread positive and purifying selection across the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) genome.

Authors:  Miguel Carneiro; Frank W Albert; José Melo-Ferreira; Nicolas Galtier; Philippe Gayral; Jose A Blanco-Aguiar; Rafael Villafuerte; Michael W Nachman; Nuno Ferrand
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Studying patterns of recent evolution at synonymous sites and intronic sites in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Controlling type-I error of the McDonald-Kreitman test in genomewide scans for selection on noncoding DNA.

Authors:  Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-09-14       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Selection on codon usage and base composition in Drosophila americana.

Authors:  Sophie Marion de Procé; Kai Zeng; Andrea J Betancourt; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Evidence that purifying selection acts on promoter sequences.

Authors:  Robert K Arthur; Ilya Ruvinsky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Recombination yet inefficient selection along the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup's fourth chromosome.

Authors:  J Roman Arguello; Yue Zhang; Tomoyuki Kado; Chuanzhu Fan; Ruoping Zhao; Hideki Innan; Wen Wang; Manyuan Long
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Darwinian evolution in the light of genomics.

Authors:  Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.