Literature DB >> 18508874

Cumulative patient effective dose in cardiology.

G Bedetti1, N Botto, M G Andreassi, C Traino, E Vano, E Picano.   

Abstract

Medical radiation from X-rays and nuclear medicine is the largest non-natural (man-made) source of radiation exposure in Western countries. The aim of this study was to assess the individual cumulative effective dose in patients admitted to our cardiology ward. We collected a cumulative radiological history from a structured questionnaire and access to hospital records in 50 consecutive adult patients (36 males; age, 66.7+/-10.8 years) admitted to the Institute of Clinical Physiology in Pisa. The cumulative effective dose was assessed as an indicator of stochastic risk of cancer. We derived the effective dose for each individual examination from the Medical Imaging Guidelines of the European Commission (2001). On average, each patient underwent a median of 36 examinations (interquartile range, 23-46). The median cumulative effective dose was 60.6 mSv. Three types of procedures were responsible for approximately 86% of the total collective effective dose: (i) arteriography and interventional cardiology (12% of examinations, 48% of average dose per patient); (ii) nuclear medicine (5% of examinations, 21% of average dose per patient); and (iii) CT (4% of examinations, 17% of average dose per patient). The median estimated extra risk of cancer was approximately 1 in 200 exposed subjects. In conclusion, the average contemporary cardiological patient is exposed to a significant cumulative effective dose from diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. It is important to log cumulative dose for each patient at the time of each examination. Every effort should be made to justify the indications and to optimize the doses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18508874     DOI: 10.1259/bjr/29507259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  22 in total

1.  Evaluation of coronary angiographic projections to balance the clinical yield with the radiation risk.

Authors:  I R Smith; J Cameron; K L Mengersen; J T Rivers
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Multiple testing, cumulative radiation dose, and clinical indications in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Andrew J Einstein; Shepard D Weiner; Adam Bernheim; Michal Kulon; Sabahat Bokhari; Lynne L Johnson; Jeffrey W Moses; Stephen Balter
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Multiple procedures and cumulative individual radiation exposure in interventional cardiology: A long-term retrospective study.

Authors:  Birgitta M Weltermann; Thomas Rock; Gunnar Brix; Alexander Schegerer; Peter Berndt; Anja Viehmann; Sabrina Reinders; Stefan Gesenhues
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Cardiac imaging: does radiation matter?

Authors:  Andrew J Einstein; Juhani Knuuti
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Atrial Flutter Ablation Using MediGuideTM Non-fluoroscopic Catheter Tracking System: A Novel Technology to Reduce Radiation Exposure.

Authors:  Anand Pillai; Madhu Reddy; Michael Heard; Ajay Vallakati; Loren Berenbom; Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2012-10-06

Review 6.  Physician and Patient Radiation Exposure During Endovascular Procedures.

Authors:  Andrew M Goldsweig; J Dawn Abbott; Herbert D Aronow
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-02

Review 7.  "Near-zero" fluoroscopic exposure in supraventricular arrhythmia ablation using the EnSite NavX™ mapping system: personal experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  Michela Casella; Gemma Pelargonio; Antonio Dello Russo; Stefania Riva; Stefano Bartoletti; Pasquale Santangeli; Antonio Scarà; Tommaso Sanna; Riccardo Proietti; Luigi Di Biase; G Joseph Gallinghouse; Maria Lucia Narducci; Luigi Sisto; Fulvio Bellocci; Andrea Natale; Claudio Tondo
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 1.900

8.  Cumulative exposure to ionizing radiation from diagnostic and therapeutic cardiac imaging procedures: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Jersey Chen; Andrew J Einstein; Reza Fazel; Harlan M Krumholz; Yongfei Wang; Joseph S Ross; Henry H Ting; Nilay D Shah; Khurram Nasir; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Non-fluoroscopic navigation systems for radiofrequency catheter ablation for supraventricular tachycardia reduce ionising radiation exposure.

Authors:  Jason See; Jonah L Amora; Sheldon Lee; Paul Lim; Wee Siong Teo; Boon Yew Tan; Kah Leng Ho; Chee Wan Lee; Chi-Keong Ching
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 1.858

Review 10.  Health risk and biological effects of cardiac ionising imaging: from epidemiology to genes.

Authors:  Ilenia Foffa; Monica Cresci; Maria Grazia Andreassi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.