Literature DB >> 23540373

Misrecognition of need: women's experiences of and explanations for undergoing cesarean delivery.

Kristin P Tully1, Helen L Ball.   

Abstract

International rates of operative delivery are consistently higher than the World Health Organization determined is appropriate. This suggests that factors other than clinical indications contribute to cesarean section. Data presented here are from interviews with 115 mothers on the postnatal ward of a hospital in Northeast England during February 2006 to March 2009 after the women underwent either unscheduled or scheduled cesarean childbirth. Using thematic content analysis, we found women's accounts of their experiences largely portrayed cesarean section as everything that they had wanted to avoid, but necessary given their situations. Contrary to popular suggestion, the data did not indicate impersonalized medical practice, or that cesareans were being performed 'on request.' The categorization of cesareans into 'emergency' and 'elective' did not reflect maternal experiences. Rather, many unscheduled cesareans were conducted without indications of fetal distress and most scheduled cesareans were not booked because of 'choice.' The authoritative knowledge that influenced maternal perceptions of the need to undergo operative delivery included moving forward from 'prolonged' labor and scheduling cesarean as a prophylactic to avoid anticipated psychological or physical harm. In spontaneously defending themselves against stigma from the 'too posh to push' label that is currently common in the media, women portrayed debate on the appropriateness of cesarean childbirth as a social critique instead of a health issue. The findings suggest the 'need' for some cesareans is due to misrecognition of indications by all involved. The factors underlying many cesareans may actually be modifiable, but informed choice and healthful outcomes are impeded by lack of awareness regarding the benefits of labor on the fetal transition to extrauterine life, the maternal desire for predictability in their parturition and recovery experiences, and possibly lack of sufficient experience for providers in a variety of vaginal delivery scenarios (non-progressive labor, breech presentation, and/or after previous cesarean).
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23540373      PMCID: PMC3613981          DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.02.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  59 in total

1.  Why do women go along with this stuff?

Authors:  Michael C Klein; Carol Sakala; Penny Simkin; Robbie Davis-Floyd; Judith P Rooks; Jane Pincus
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.689

2.  Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates.

Authors:  Ana P Betrán; Mario Merialdi; Jeremy A Lauer; Wang Bing-Shun; Jane Thomas; Paul Van Look; Marsden Wagner
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.980

Review 3.  Physiology of fetal lung fluid clearance and the effect of labor.

Authors:  Lucky Jain; Douglas C Eaton
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.300

4.  How social context impacts on women's fears of childbirth: a Western Australian example.

Authors:  Colleen Fisher; Yvonne Hauck; Jenny Fenwick
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  The vanishing mother: Cesarean section and "evidence-based obstetrics".

Authors:  Claire L Wendland
Journal:  Med Anthropol Q       Date:  2007-06

6.  Caesarean birth: consumption, safety, order, and good mothering.

Authors:  Joanne Bryant; Maree Porter; Sally K Tracy; Elizabeth A Sullivan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Why do women go along with this stuff?

Authors:  S Kitzinger; J M Green; B Chalmers; M Keirse; K Lindstrom; E Hemminki
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.689

Review 8.  Cesarean delivery: background, trends, and epidemiology.

Authors:  Fay Menacker; Eugene Declercq; Marian F Macdorman
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.300

9.  Are there "unnecessary" cesarean sections? Perceptions of women and obstetricians about cesarean sections for nonclinical indications.

Authors:  Jane J Weaver; Helen Statham; Martin Richards
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.689

Review 10.  A critique of the literature on women's request for cesarean section.

Authors:  Jenny Gamble; Debra K Creedy; Chris McCourt; Jane Weaver; Sarah Beake
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.689

View more
  9 in total

1.  Women's view on shared decision making and autonomy in childbirth: cohort study of Belgian women.

Authors:  Elke Deherder; Ilse Delbaere; Adriana Macedo; Marianne J Nieuwenhuijze; Sven Van Laere; Katrien Beeckman
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.105

2.  Mode of childbirth in low-risk pregnancies: Nicaraguan physicians' viewpoints.

Authors:  Mercedes Colomar; Maria Luisa Cafferata; Alicia Aleman; Graciela Castellano; Ezequiel Garcia Elorrio; Fernando Althabe; Susheela Engelbrecht
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-12

3.  Development of strategies to reduce cesarean delivery rates in iran 2012-2014: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Razieh Lotfi; Fahimeh Ramezani Tehrani; Marzieh Rostami Dovom; Farahnaz Torkestani; Mehrandokht Abedini; Sima Sajedinejad
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2014-12

4.  Fear, Risk, and the Responsible Choice: Risk Narratives and Lowering the Rate of Caesarean Sections in High-income Countries.

Authors:  Helga Hallgrimsdottir; Leah Shumka; Catherine Althaus; Cecilia Benoit
Journal:  AIMS Public Health       Date:  2017-12-26

5.  Women's perspectives on caesarean section recovery, infection and the PREPS trial: a qualitative pilot study.

Authors:  Annalise Weckesser; Nicola Farmer; Rinita Dam; Amie Wilson; Victoria Hodgetts Morton; R Katie Morris
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Anesthesia, sex and miscarriage history may influence the association between cesarean delivery and autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Ye Yang; Jingjing Lin; Xiaozi Lu; Guanglei Xun; Renrong Wu; Yamin Li; Jianjun Ou; Yidong Shen; Kun Xia; Jingping Zhao
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 2.125

Review 7.  Vaginal birth after caesarean section: why is uptake so low? Insights from a meta-ethnographic synthesis of women's accounts of their birth choices.

Authors:  Mairead Black; Vikki A Entwistle; Siladitya Bhattacharya; Katie Gillies
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Childhood emotional and behavior problems and their associations with cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Erigene Rutayisire; Xiaoyan Wu; Kun Huang; Shuman Tao; Yunxiao Chen; Fangbiao Tao
Journal:  Braz J Psychiatry       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 2.697

9.  Women's psychosocial outcomes following an emergency caesarean section: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Madeleine Benton; Amy Salter; Nicole Tape; Chris Wilkinson; Deborah Turnbull
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.007

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.