Literature DB >> 18500940

Unifying life-history analyses for inference of fitness and population growth.

Ruth G Shaw1, Charles J Geyer, Stuart Wagenius, Helen H Hangelbroek, Julie R Etterson.   

Abstract

The lifetime fitnesses of individuals comprising a population determine its numerical dynamics, and genetic variation in fitness results in evolutionary change. This dual importance of individual fitness is well understood, but empirical fitness records generally violate the assumptions of standard statistical approaches. This problem has undermined comprehensive study of fitness and impeded empirical synthesis of the numerical and genetic dynamics of populations. Recently developed aster models remedy this problem by explicitly modeling the dependence of later-expressed components of fitness (e.g., fecundity) on those expressed earlier (e.g., survival to reproduce). Moreover, aster models employ different sampling distributions for different components of fitness (e.g., binomial for survival over a given interval and Poisson for fecundity). Analysis is done by maximum likelihood, and the resulting distributions for lifetime fitness closely approximate observed data. We illustrate the breadth of aster models' utility with three examples demonstrating estimation of the finite rate of increase, comparison of mean fitness among genotypic groups, and analysis of phenotypic selection. Aster models offer a unified approach to addressing the breadth of questions in evolution and ecology for which life-history data are gathered.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18500940     DOI: 10.1086/588063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  38 in total

1.  Differences in the temporal dynamics of phenotypic selection among fitness components in the wild.

Authors:  Adam M Siepielski; Joseph D DiBattista; Jeffrey A Evans; Stephanie M Carlson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Special issues on advances in quantitative genetics: introduction.

Authors:  B Walsh
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 3.  Ecological genomics of local adaptation.

Authors:  Outi Savolainen; Martin Lascoux; Juha Merilä
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 4.  Three sequenced legume genomes and many crop species: rich opportunities for translational genomics.

Authors:  Steven B Cannon; Gregory D May; Scott A Jackson
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Variation in pollen limitation and floral parasitism across a mating system transition in a Pacific coastal dune plant: evolutionary causes or ecological consequences?

Authors:  Sara Dart; Christopher G Eckert
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Natural selection and outbreeding depression suggest adaptive differentiation in the invasive range of a clonal plant.

Authors:  Pauline O Pantoja; C E Timothy Paine; Mario Vallejo-Marín
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Evolutionary rescue beyond the models.

Authors:  Richard Gomulkiewicz; Ruth G Shaw
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Individual fitness and phenotypic selection in age-structured populations with constant growth rates.

Authors:  Jacob A Moorad
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  A widespread chromosomal inversion polymorphism contributes to a major life-history transition, local adaptation, and reproductive isolation.

Authors:  David B Lowry; John H Willis
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 10.  Quantitative genetic study of the adaptive process.

Authors:  R G Shaw; F H Shaw
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.821

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.