Literature DB >> 21047862

Differences in the temporal dynamics of phenotypic selection among fitness components in the wild.

Adam M Siepielski1, Joseph D DiBattista, Jeffrey A Evans, Stephanie M Carlson.   

Abstract

The balance of selection acting through different fitness components (e.g. fecundity, mating success, survival) determines the potential tempo and trajectory of adaptive evolution. Yet the extent to which the temporal dynamics of phenotypic selection may vary among fitness components is poorly understood. Here, we compiled a database of 3978 linear selection coefficients from temporally replicated studies of selection in wild populations to address this question. Across studies, we find that multi-year selection through mating success and fecundity is stronger than selection through survival, but varies less in direction. We also report that selection through mating success varies more in long-term average strength than selection through either survival or fecundity. The consistency in direction and stronger long-term average strength of selection through mating success and fecundity suggests that selection through these fitness components should cause more persistent directional evolution relative to selection through survival. Similar patterns were apparent for the subset of studies that evaluated the temporal dynamics of selection on traits simultaneously using several different fitness components, but few such studies exist. Taken together, these results reveal key differences in the temporal dynamics of selection acting through different fitness components, but they also reveal important limitations in our understanding of how selection drives adaptive evolution.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21047862      PMCID: PMC3081754          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  34 in total

1.  Experimentally assessing the relative importance of predation and competition as agents of selection.

Authors:  Ryan Calsbeek; Robert M Cox
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The sexual selection continuum.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Robert Brooks; John M McNamara; Alasdair I Houston
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Spatial and temporal dynamics in a sexual selection mosaic.

Authors:  Thomas P Gosden; Erik I Svensson
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 4.  Evidence for ecological speciation and its alternative.

Authors:  Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Natural selection on a major armor gene in threespine stickleback.

Authors:  Rowan D H Barrett; Sean M Rogers; Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Unifying life-history analyses for inference of fitness and population growth.

Authors:  Ruth G Shaw; Charles J Geyer; Stuart Wagenius; Helen H Hangelbroek; Julie R Etterson
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 7.  It's about time: the temporal dynamics of phenotypic selection in the wild.

Authors:  Adam M Siepielski; Joseph D DiBattista; Stephanie M Carlson
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 9.492

8.  The genetic basis of adaptive melanism in pocket mice.

Authors:  Michael W Nachman; Hopi E Hoekstra; Susan L D'Agostino
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Explaining stasis: microevolutionary studies in natural populations.

Authors:  J Merilä; B C Sheldon; L E Kruuk
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.082

10.  Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus).

Authors:  D W Schemske; H D Bradshaw
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  21 in total

1.  Heritability and adaptive significance of the number of egg-dummies in the cichlid fish Astatotilapia burtoni.

Authors:  Topi K Lehtonen; Axel Meyer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Opposing selection and environmental variation modify optimal timing of breeding.

Authors:  Corey E Tarwater; Steven R Beissinger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Genetic variation in social influence on mate preferences.

Authors:  Darren Rebar; Rafael L Rodríguez
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Fluctuations in lifetime selection in an autocorrelated environment.

Authors:  Olivier Cotto; Luis-Miguel Chevin
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 1.570

5.  Adaptive phenotypic plasticity is under stabilizing selection in Daphnia.

Authors:  Dörthe Becker; Karen Barnard-Kubow; Robert Porter; Austin Edwards; Erin Voss; Andrew P Beckerman; Alan O Bergland
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 19.100

Review 6.  Human influences on the strength of phenotypic selection.

Authors:  Vincent Fugère; Andrew P Hendry
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Between migration load and evolutionary rescue: dispersal, adaptation and the response of spatially structured populations to environmental change.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Bourne; Greta Bocedi; Justin M J Travis; Robin J Pakeman; Rob W Brooker; Katja Schiffers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Evolutionary rates for multivariate traits: the role of selection and genetic variation.

Authors:  William Pitchers; Jason B Wolf; Tom Tregenza; John Hunt; Ian Dworkin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Positive-to-negative behavioural responses suggest hedonic evaluation in treefrog mate choice.

Authors:  Gerlinde Höbel; Rafael L Rodríguez
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Temporal variation in selection on body length and date of return in a wild population of coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch.

Authors:  Miyako Kodama; Jeffrey J Hard; Kerry A Naish
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.