Literature DB >> 18495875

Dynamic spectrotemporal feature selectivity in the auditory midbrain.

Nicholas A Lesica1, Benedikt Grothe.   

Abstract

The transformation of auditory information from the cochlea to the cortex is a highly nonlinear process. Studies using tone stimuli have revealed that changes in even the most basic parameters of the auditory stimulus can alter neural response properties; for example, a change in stimulus intensity can cause a shift in a neuron's preferred frequency. However, it is not yet clear how such nonlinearities contribute to the processing of spectrotemporal features in complex sounds. Here, we use spectrotemporal receptive fields (STRFs) to characterize the effects of stimulus intensity on feature selectivity in the mammalian inferior colliculus (IC). At low intensities, we find that STRFs are relatively simple, typically consisting of a single excitatory region, indicating that the neural response is simply a reflection of the stimulus amplitude at the preferred frequency. In contrast, we find that STRFs at high intensities typically consist of a combination of an excitatory region and one or more inhibitory regions, often in a spectrotemporally inseparable arrangement, indicating selectivity for complex auditory features. We show that a linear-nonlinear model with the appropriate STRF can predict neural responses to stimuli with a fixed intensity, and we demonstrate that a simple extension of the model with an intensity-dependent STRF can predict responses to stimuli with varying intensity. These results illustrate the complexity of auditory feature selectivity in the IC, but also provide encouraging evidence that the prediction of nonlinear responses to complex stimuli is a tractable problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18495875      PMCID: PMC6670618          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0073-08.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  54 in total

1.  Noise improves transfer of near-threshold, phase-locked activity of the cochlear nerve: evidence for stochastic resonance?

Authors:  K R Henry
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Spectral-temporal receptive fields of nonlinear auditory neurons obtained using natural sounds.

Authors:  F E Theunissen; K Sen; A J Doupe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The mechanical waveform of the basilar membrane. III. Intensity effects.

Authors:  E de Boer; A L Nuttall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Spectro-temporal response field characterization with dynamic ripples in ferret primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  D A Depireux; J Z Simon; D J Klein; S A Shamma
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Basilar membrane responses to broadband stimuli.

Authors:  A Recio; W S Rhode
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Representation of temporal features of complex sounds by the discharge patterns of neurons in the owl's inferior colliculus.

Authors:  C H Keller; T T Takahashi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Auditory temporal processing: responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  B S Krishna; M N Semple
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  Subcortical neural coding mechanisms for auditory temporal processing.

Authors:  R D Frisina
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Iontophoresis in vivo demonstrates a key role for GABA(A) and glycinergic inhibition in shaping frequency response areas in the inferior colliculus of guinea pig.

Authors:  F E LeBeau; M S Malmierca; A Rees
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Feature analysis of natural sounds in the songbird auditory forebrain.

Authors:  K Sen; F E Theunissen; A J Doupe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  31 in total

1.  Receptive field dimensionality increases from the auditory midbrain to cortex.

Authors:  Craig A Atencio; Tatyana O Sharpee; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Millisecond encoding precision of auditory cortex neurons.

Authors:  Christoph Kayser; Nikos K Logothetis; Stefano Panzeri
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Spike timing precision changes with spike rate adaptation in the owl's auditory space map.

Authors:  Clifford H Keller; Terry T Takahashi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Two-dimensional adaptation in the auditory forebrain.

Authors:  Tatyana O Sharpee; Katherine I Nagel; Allison J Doupe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Hierarchical representations in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Tatyana O Sharpee; Craig A Atencio; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Emergence of band-pass filtering through adaptive spiking in the owl's cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Bertrand Fontaine; Katrina M MacLeod; Susan T Lubejko; Louisa J Steinberg; Christine Köppl; Jose L Peña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Robust Rate-Place Coding of Resolved Components in Harmonic and Inharmonic Complex Tones in Auditory Midbrain.

Authors:  Yaqing Su; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Spectral and temporal modulation tradeoff in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Francisco A Rodríguez; Heather L Read; Monty A Escabí
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Modeling Population Spike Trains with Specified Time-Varying Spike Rates, Trial-to-Trial Variability, and Pairwise Signal and Noise Correlations.

Authors:  Dmitry R Lyamzin; Jakob H Macke; Nicholas A Lesica
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  Linear processing of interaural level difference underlies spatial tuning in the nucleus of the brachium of the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Sean J Slee; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.