Literature DB >> 23447600

Linear processing of interaural level difference underlies spatial tuning in the nucleus of the brachium of the inferior colliculus.

Sean J Slee1, Eric D Young.   

Abstract

The spatial location of sounds is an important aspect of auditory perception, but the ways in which space is represented are not fully understood. No space map has been found within the primary auditory pathway. However, a space map has been found in the nucleus of the brachium of the inferior colliculus (BIN), which provides a major auditory projection to the superior colliculus. We measured the spectral processing underlying auditory spatial tuning in the BIN of unanesthetized marmoset monkeys. Because neurons in the BIN respond poorly to tones and are broadly tuned, we used a broadband stimulus with random spectral shapes (RSSs) from which both spatial receptive fields and frequency sensitivity can be derived. Responses to virtual space (VS) stimuli, based on the animal's own ear acoustics, were compared with the predictions of a weight-function model of responses to the RSS stimuli. First-order (linear) weight functions had broad spectral tuning (approximately three octaves) and were excitatory in the contralateral ear, inhibitory in the ipsilateral ear, and biased toward high frequencies. Responses to interaural time differences and spectral cues were relatively weak. In cross-validation tests, the first-order RSS model accurately predicted the measured VS tuning curves in the majority of neurons, but was inaccurate in 25% of neurons. In some cases, second-order weighting functions led to significant improvements. Finally, we found a significant correlation between the degree of binaural weight asymmetry and the best azimuth. Overall, the results suggest that linear processing of interaural level difference underlies spatial tuning in the BIN.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23447600      PMCID: PMC3613225          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3437-12.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  48 in total

1.  Single-unit responses in the inferior colliculus of decerebrate cats. II. Sensitivity to interaural level differences.

Authors:  K A Davis; R Ramachandran; B J May
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Linear processing of spatial cues in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  J W Schnupp; T D Mrsic-Flogel; A J King
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-11-08       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Characterization of external ear impulse responses using Golay codes.

Authors:  B Zhou; D M Green; J C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Systematic representation of sound locations in the primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Khaleel A Razak
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Nonlinear modeling of auditory-nerve rate responses to wideband stimuli.

Authors:  Eric D Young; Barbara M Calhoun
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-09-14       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Limited segregation of different types of sound localization information among classes of units in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Steven M Chase; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Coding for auditory space in the nucleus of the brachium of the inferior colliculus in the ferret.

Authors:  J W Schnupp; A J King
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The representation of auditory space in the mammalian superior colliculus.

Authors:  A R Palmer; A J King
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1982-09-16       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Localization of sound in rooms, II: The effects of a single reflecting surface.

Authors:  B Rakerd; W M Hartmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Interaural timing cues do not contribute to the map of space in the ferret superior colliculus: a virtual acoustic space study.

Authors:  Robert A A Campbell; Timothy P Doubell; Fernando R Nodal; Jan W H Schnupp; Andrew J King
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-09-14       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  18 in total

1.  Rapid Task-Related Plasticity of Spectrotemporal Receptive Fields in the Auditory Midbrain.

Authors:  Sean J Slee; Stephen V David
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Auditory distance coding in rabbit midbrain neurons and human perception: monaural amplitude modulation depth as a cue.

Authors:  Duck O Kim; Pavel Zahorik; Laurel H Carney; Brian B Bishop; Shigeyuki Kuwada
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Transformation of spatial sensitivity along the ascending auditory pathway.

Authors:  Justin D Yao; Peter Bremen; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Directing eye gaze enhances auditory spatial cue discrimination.

Authors:  Ross K Maddox; Dean A Pospisil; G Christopher Stecker; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Azimuth and envelope coding in the inferior colliculus of the unanesthetized rabbit: effect of reverberation and distance.

Authors:  Shigeyuki Kuwada; Brian Bishop; Duck O Kim
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Alignment of sound localization cues in the nucleus of the brachium of the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Sean J Slee; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Neural Representations of the Full Spatial Field in Auditory Cortex of Awake Marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Evan D Remington; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Synthesis of Hemispheric ITD Tuning from the Readout of a Neural Map: Commonalities of Proposed Coding Schemes in Birds and Mammals.

Authors:  Jose L Peña; Fanny Cazettes; Michael V Beckert; Brian J Fischer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Adaptive auditory computations.

Authors:  Shihab Shamma; Jonathan Fritz
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 6.627

10.  Task Engagement Improves Neural Discriminability in the Auditory Midbrain of the Marmoset Monkey.

Authors:  Luke A Shaheen; Sean J Slee; Stephen V David
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.