Literature DB >> 18493760

The trochanter slide osteotomy approach for resurfacing hip arthroplasty.

Rocco P Pitto1.   

Abstract

The aim of this prospective study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the greater trochanter slide osteotomy approach for resurfacing hip arthroplasty. Fifty consecutive hips (47 patients) with degenerative joint disease were enrolled in the study. Serial clinical and radiological assessments were performed after the index operation. At 1-year follow-up, the clinical outcome and patient satisfaction were rated excellent or good in all hips. The radiological assessment showed signs of satisfactory implant alignment. Periprosthetic fractures and non-unions of the greater trochanter were not observed. The greater trochanter slide osteotomy approach for resurfacing hip arthroplasty is a safe procedure and provides optimal exposure of the acetabulum and proximal femur, maintaining the soft-tissue integrity of the hip joint. Blood supply of the proximal femur is not violated using this approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18493760      PMCID: PMC2899055          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-008-0538-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  18 in total

1.  The femoral head/neck offset and hip resurfacing.

Authors:  P E Beaulé; N Harvey; E Zaragoza; M J Le Duff; F J Dorey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-01

2.  The anterolateral approach leads to less disruption of the femoral head-neck blood supply than the posterior approach during hip resurfacing.

Authors:  R Steffen; K O'Rourke; H S Gill; D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-10

Review 3.  [A new trochanteric osteotomy method for a postero-lateral approach of the hip (330 operations with posterior transosseus and paramuscular curved approach].

Authors:  J P Courpied; G Desportes; M Postel
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1991

4.  Vascularity of the femoral head after Birmingham hip resurfacing. A technetium Tc 99m bone scan/single photon emission computed tomography study.

Authors:  Michael Leunig; Reinhold Ganz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip replacement. A standard system of terminology for reporting results.

Authors:  R C Johnston; R H Fitzgerald; W H Harris; R Poss; M E Müller; C B Sledge
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  A new transtrochanteric approach to the hip.

Authors:  U Lindgren; O Svenson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification.

Authors:  A F Brooker; J W Bowerman; R A Robinson; L H Riley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Surgical approaches for the performance of surface replacement arthroplasties.

Authors:  S D Stulberg
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 2.472

9.  The effect of hip resurfacing on oxygen concentration in the femoral head.

Authors:  R T Steffen; S R Smith; J P G Urban; P McLardy-Smith; D J Beard; H S Gill; D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-11

10.  Anterolateral compared to posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: differences in component positioning, hip strength, and hip motion.

Authors:  D R Gore; M P Murray; S B Sepic; G M Gardner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  6 in total

1.  The Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: 5-year clinical and radiographic results from a District General Hospital.

Authors:  B Ollivere; S Duckett; A August; M Porteous
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Results of hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Francesco Falez; Fabio Favetti; Filippo Casella; Matteo Papalia; Gabriele Panegrossi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Birmingham hip resurfacing: five to eight year results.

Authors:  Aleksi Reito; Timo Puolakka; Jorma Pajamäki
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Accuracy of computer-assisted navigation for femoral head resurfacing decreases in hips with abnormal anatomy.

Authors:  Rocco P Pitto; Sharif Malak; Iain A Anderson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Adverse reaction to metal debris with concomitant incidental crystalline arthropathy in hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Edward J Testa; Brian J McGrory
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2016-12-01

Review 6.  Trochanteric osteotomy in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kavin Sundaram; Ahmed Siddiqi; Atul F Kamath; Carlos A Higuera-Rueda
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2020-09-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.