Literature DB >> 17259408

The femoral head/neck offset and hip resurfacing.

P E Beaulé1, N Harvey, E Zaragoza, M J Le Duff, F J Dorey.   

Abstract

Because the femoral head/neck junction is preserved in hip resurfacing, patients may be at greater risk of impingement, leading to abnormal wear patterns and pain. We assessed femoral head/neck offset in 63 hips undergoing metal-on-metal hip resurfacing and in 56 hips presenting with non-arthritic pain secondary to femoroacetabular impingement. Most hips undergoing resurfacing (57%; 36) had an offset ratio <or= 0.15 pre-operatively and required greater correction of offset at operation than the rest of the group. In the non-arthritic hips the mean offset ratio was 0.137 (0.04 to 0.23), with the offset ratio correlating negatively to an increasing alpha angle. An offset ratio <or= 0.15 had a 9.5-fold increased relative risk of having an alpha angle >or= 50.5 degrees. Most hips undergoing resurfacing have an abnormal femoral head/neck offset, which is best assessed in the sagittal plane.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17259408     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B1.18011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  23 in total

1.  The prevalence of groin pain after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and total hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Robert B Bartelt; Brandon J Yuan; Robert T Trousdale; Rafael J Sierra
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Validity of the alpha angle measurement on plain radiographs in the evaluation of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Cefin Barton; Matias J Salineros; Kawan S Rakhra; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Remodelling of femoral head-neck junction in slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a multicentre study.

Authors:  Mio Akiyama; Yasuharu Nakashima; Toshio Kitano; Tomoyuki Nakamura; Kazuyuki Takamura; Yusuke Kohno; Takuaki Yamamoto; Goro Motomura; Masanobu Ohishi; Satoshi Hamai; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Bone scintigraphy in femoroacetabular impingement: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Wadih Y Matar; Olivier May; François Raymond; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  The young adult with hip impingement: deciding on the optimal intervention.

Authors:  Paul E Beaulé; David J Allen; John C Clohisy; Perry Schoenecker; Michael Leunig
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  A local reference frame for describing the proximal human femur: application in clinical settings.

Authors:  Milad Masjedi; Charison Tay; Simon J Harris; Justin P Cobb
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  The learning curve for adopting hip resurfacing among hip specialists.

Authors:  Ryan M Nunley; Jinjun Zhu; Peter J Brooks; C Anderson Engh; Stephen J Raterman; John S Rogerson; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Hip replacement in the athlete: is there a role?

Authors:  M J Wilson; R N Villar
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Comparison of femoroacetabular impingement-related radiographic features in a convenience sample of Japanese patients with and without herniation pits.

Authors:  Kazuaki Mineta; Tomohiro Goto; Keizo Wada; Yasuaki Tamaki; Daisuke Hamada; Kosaku Higashino; Koichi Sairyo
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Femoroacetabular impingement and classification of the cam deformity: the reference interval in normal hips.

Authors:  Thomas C B Pollard; Richard N Villar; Mark R Norton; E Darren Fern; Mark R Williams; David J Simpson; David W Murray; Andrew J Carr
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.