| Literature DB >> 18489796 |
Pragya Srivastava1, Rajneesh Jha, Sylvette Bas, Sudha Salhan, Aruna Mittal.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The magnitude of reproductive morbidity associated with sexually transmitted Chlamydia trachomatis infection is enormous. Association of antibodies to chlamydial heat shock proteins (cHSP) 60 and 10 with various disease sequelae such as infertility or ectopic pregnancy has been reported. Cell-mediated immunity is essential in resolution and in protection to Chlamydia as well as is involved in the immunopathogenesis of chlamydial diseases. To date only peripheral cell mediated immune responses have been evaluated for cHSP60. These studies suggest cHSPs as important factors involved in immunopathological condition associated with infection. Hence study of specific cytokine responses of mononuclear cells from the infectious site to cHSP60 and cHSP10 may elucidate their actual role in the cause of immunopathogenesis and the disease outcome.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18489796 PMCID: PMC2412883 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-6-20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Biol Endocrinol ISSN: 1477-7827 Impact factor: 5.211
Prevalance of cHSP60 and cHSP10 specific antibodies in study population
| 25 (21–37) | 3 (8) | 2 (5) | |
| 27 (23–43) | 15 (24)a | 13 (21)b | |
| 29 (21–42) | 35 (50)c,e | 26 (37)d,f | |
(n) represents number of patients
aP = 0.04 as compared to Group I; bP = 0.03 as compared to Group I; cP < 0.0001 as compared to Group I; dP < 0.0001 as compared to Group I; eP = 0.002 as compared to Group II; fP = 0.04 as compared to Group II where,
Group I-Healthy women with no infertility problem
Group II-Chlamydia positive women with no infertility problem
Group III-Chlamydia positive women with infertility
Categorical variables were compared using the χ2 test
Figure 1Correlation of anti-cHSP60 and anti-cHSP10 IgG antibodies in cervical washes of patients. Scatter plot showing the correlation between anti-cHSP60 and anti-cHSP10 IgG antibodies among patients groups (a) Group II and (b) Group III. A significant correlation was observed in Group II as well as Group III where, Group II (n = 63) – Chlamydia positive women with no infertility problem. Group III (n = 70) – Chlamydia positive women with infertility. Correlation was tested with Spearman's correlation coefficient
Figure 2Cytokine concentrations after stimulation with cHSP60 and cHSP10. Box plot representing concentrations of (a) IFN-γ (b) IL-10 (c) TNF-α in supernatants of cervical mononuclear cells after stimulation with cHSP60 and cHSP10. A significant increase in levels of IFN-γ, IL-10 and TNF-α was observed after stimulation with cHSP60 and increased IFN-γ and IL-10 levels were observed after stimulation with cHSP10 in Group III as compared to Group I and Group II. The horizontal line in the middle of the box is the median value of the responses and the lower (upper) is the 25th (75th) percentile. I, II and III represent Group I, Group II and Group III respectively where, Group I (n = 39) – Healthy women with no infertility problem. Group II (n = 63) – Chlamydia positive women with no infertility problem. Group III (n = 70) – Chlamydia positive women with infertility. ns – Not significant. Mann-Whitney U-test was used for comparing two groups
Concentration (pg/ml) of cHSP60 and cHSP10 specific cytokines in different groups.
| 11 (0–115) | 8 (0–193) | 15 (0–289) | 8 (0–174) | 6 (0–121) | 14 (0–128) | |
| 28 (0–508) | 24 (0–480) | 27 (0–278) | 26 (0–671) | 14 (0–199) | 19 (0–289) | |
| 90 (0–743) | 67 (0–516) | 63 (0–973) | 52 (0–758) | 77 (0–694) | 45 (0–566) | |
(n) represents number of patients
Group I-Healthy women with no infertility problem
Group II-Chlamydia positive women with no infertility problem
Group III-Chlamydia positive women with infertility