Literature DB >> 18484832

An anti-Hick's effect in monkey and human saccade reaction times.

Bonnie M Lawrence1, Alex St John, Richard A Abrams, Lawrence H Snyder.   

Abstract

In order to execute movements to targets in the environment, we must first select a target in which to move, generally from an array of alternatives. Hick's Law states that reaction time (RT) increases as the number of response alternatives increases. Violations of this law, however, generally in the form of the absence of a relationship between response alternatives and RT have been reported in the literature. K. Kveraga, L. Boucher, and H. C. Hughes (2002), for example, found that saccades to visual targets violate Hick's Law. To examine this violation further, we measured saccade RTs in monkeys and humans and found that saccade RTs actually decreased as the number of potential target locations increased. We hypothesize that this arises because subjects must actively inhibit premature saccades, and that the required inhibition increases as the certainty of a movement to a particular location increases. With increased inhibition, saccade onset is delayed, resulting in an anti-Hick's effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18484832     DOI: 10.1167/8.3.26

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  10 in total

1.  An anti-Hick's effect for exogenous, but not endogenous, saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Bonnie M Lawrence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Saccades and reaches, behaving differently.

Authors:  Bonnie M Lawrence; Andrew L Gardella
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Neuronal responses to target onset in oculomotor and somatomotor parietal circuits differ markedly in a choice task.

Authors:  J Kubanek; C Wang; L H Snyder
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The effects of bottom-up target luminance and top-down spatial target predictability on saccadic reaction times.

Authors:  Robert A Marino; Douglas Perry Munoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Manipulations of the relationship between response alternatives and exogenous saccade latencies.

Authors:  Bonnie M Lawrence; Joseph S Weaver
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Race to accumulate evidence for few and many saccade alternatives: an exception to speed-accuracy trade-off.

Authors:  M Puntiroli; C Tandonnet; D Kerzel; S Born
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Response selection in prosaccades, antisaccades, and other volitional saccades.

Authors:  Lisa Kloft; Benedikt Reuter; Jayalakshmi Viswanathan; Norbert Kathmann; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  A memory-based model of Hick's law.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; John R Anderson
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The influence of motor training on human express saccade production.

Authors:  Raquel Bibi; Jay A Edelman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Saccadic landing positions reveal that eye movements are affected by distractor-based retrieval.

Authors:  Lars-Michael Schöpper; Markus Lappe; Christian Frings
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 2.157

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.