Literature DB >> 20521032

An anti-Hick's effect for exogenous, but not endogenous, saccadic eye movements.

Bonnie M Lawrence1.   

Abstract

Previously, we have shown that the reaction times (RTs) of exogenously generated saccadic eye movements decrease with an increase in the number of response alternatives (Lawrence et al. in J Vis 8(26):1-7, 2008; Lawrence and Gardella in Exp Brain Res 195(3):413-418, 2009). Because this pattern of RTs is in the direction opposite that predicted by Hick (Q J Exp Psychol 4:11-26, 1952), we termed the effect an "anti-Hick's" effect. In the present study, we examined whether this effect characterizes saccades in general, or only those saccades that are exogenously generated. An anti-Hick's effect was found for exogenous, but not for endogenous, saccades. These results demonstrate a clear dissociation between exogenously and endogenously generated saccades and place an important constraint on the anti-Hick's effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20521032     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2301-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  15 in total

1.  Saccades operate in violation of Hick's law.

Authors:  Kestutis Kveraga; Leanne Boucher; Howard C Hughes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-08-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time.

Authors:  R HYMAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1953-03

3.  Properties of saccades generated as a choice response.

Authors:  Kyoung-Min Lee; Edward L Keller; Stephen J Heinen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The magnitude of the fixation offset effect with endogenously and exogenously controlled saccades.

Authors:  K Forbes; R M Klein
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Fixation point offsets facilitate endogenous saccades.

Authors:  R A Abrams; H M Oonk; J Pratt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-02

6.  Exceptions to Hick's law: explorations with a response duration measure.

Authors:  L E Longstreth; N el-Zahhar; M B Alcorn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1985-12

7.  Laws of visual choice reaction time.

Authors:  W H Teichner; M J Krebs
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Structure of the visual array and saccadic latency: implications for oculomotor control.

Authors:  S Heywood; J Churcher
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  An anti-Hick's effect in monkey and human saccade reaction times.

Authors:  Bonnie M Lawrence; Alex St John; Richard A Abrams; Lawrence H Snyder
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Visually guided, aimed movements can be unaffected by stimulus-response uncertainty.

Authors:  Charles E Wright; Valerie F Marino; Shane A Belovsky; Charles Chubb
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 2.064

View more
  6 in total

1.  Manipulations of the relationship between response alternatives and exogenous saccade latencies.

Authors:  Bonnie M Lawrence; Joseph S Weaver
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Race to accumulate evidence for few and many saccade alternatives: an exception to speed-accuracy trade-off.

Authors:  M Puntiroli; C Tandonnet; D Kerzel; S Born
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Response selection in prosaccades, antisaccades, and other volitional saccades.

Authors:  Lisa Kloft; Benedikt Reuter; Jayalakshmi Viswanathan; Norbert Kathmann; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Exploring attention-based explanations for some violations of Hick's law for aimed movements.

Authors:  Charles E Wright; Valerie F Marino; Charles Chubb; Kelsey A Rose
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  A memory-based model of Hick's law.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; John R Anderson
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The antisaccade task: visual distractors elicit a location-independent planning 'cost'.

Authors:  Jesse C DeSimone; Stefan Everling; Matthew Heath
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.