Literature DB >> 18468942

The generative basis of natural number concepts.

Alan M Leslie1, Rochel Gelman, C R Gallistel.   

Abstract

Number concepts must support arithmetic inference. Using this principle, it can be argued that the integer concept of exactly ONE is a necessary part of the psychological foundations of number, as is the notion of the exact equality - that is, perfect substitutability. The inability to support reasoning involving exact equality is a shortcoming in current theories about the development of numerical reasoning. A simple innate basis for the natural number concepts can be proposed that embodies the arithmetic principle, supports exact equality and also enables computational compatibility with real- or rational-valued mental magnitudes.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18468942     DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  23 in total

1.  Configured-groups hypothesis: fast comparison of exact large quantities without counting.

Authors:  Sébastien Miravete; André Tricot; Slava Kalyuga; Franck Amadieu
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-07-17

Review 2.  Comprehensive neurocognitive endophenotyping strategies for mouse models of genetic disorders.

Authors:  Michael R Hunsaker
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 11.685

3.  Training the equidistant principle of number line spacing.

Authors:  Tanja Dackermann; Ursula Fischer; Stefan Huber; Hans-Christoph Nuerk; Korbinian Moeller
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2016-04-13

4.  Cross-linguistic patterns in the acquisition of quantifiers.

Authors:  Napoleon Katsos; Chris Cummins; Maria-José Ezeizabarrena; Anna Gavarró; Jelena Kuvač Kraljević; Gordana Hrzica; Kleanthes K Grohmann; Athina Skordi; Kristine Jensen de López; Lone Sundahl; Angeliek van Hout; Bart Hollebrandse; Jessica Overweg; Myrthe Faber; Margreet van Koert; Nafsika Smith; Maigi Vija; Sirli Zupping; Sari Kunnari; Tiffany Morisseau; Manana Rusieshvili; Kazuko Yatsushiro; Anja Fengler; Spyridoula Varlokosta; Katerina Konstantzou; Shira Farby; Maria Teresa Guasti; Mirta Vernice; Reiko Okabe; Miwa Isobe; Peter Crosthwaite; Yoonjee Hong; Ingrida Balčiūnienė; Yanti Marina Ahmad Nizar; Helen Grech; Daniela Gatt; Win Nee Cheong; Arve Asbjørnsen; Janne von Koss Torkildsen; Ewa Haman; Aneta Miękisz; Natalia Gagarina; Julia Puzanova; Darinka Anđelković; Maja Savić; Smiljana Jošić; Daniela Slančová; Svetlana Kapalková; Tania Barberán; Duygu Özge; Saima Hassan; Cecilia Yuet Hung Chan; Tomoya Okubo; Heather van der Lely; Uli Sauerland; Ira Noveck
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  The implications for education of an innate numerosity-processing mechanism.

Authors:  Brian Butterworth
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Grey parrot number acquisition: the inference of cardinal value from ordinal position on the numeral list.

Authors:  Irene M Pepperberg; Susan Carey
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-08-09

7.  Nonsymbolic number and cumulative area representations contribute shared and unique variance to symbolic math competence.

Authors:  Stella F Lourenco; Justin W Bonny; Edmund P Fernandez; Sonia Rao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Computation of relative numerosity of circular dot textures.

Authors:  Sabine Raphael; Barbara Dillenburger; Michael Morgan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Grammatical morphology as a source of early number word meanings.

Authors:  Alhanouf Almoammer; Jessica Sullivan; Chris Donlan; Franc Marušič; Rok Žaucer; Timothy O'Donnell; David Barner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Where Our Number Concepts Come From.

Authors:  Susan Carey
Journal:  J Philos       Date:  2009-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.