Literature DB >> 27482119

Cross-linguistic patterns in the acquisition of quantifiers.

Napoleon Katsos1, Chris Cummins2, Maria-José Ezeizabarrena3, Anna Gavarró4, Jelena Kuvač Kraljević5, Gordana Hrzica5, Kleanthes K Grohmann6, Athina Skordi7, Kristine Jensen de López8, Lone Sundahl8, Angeliek van Hout9, Bart Hollebrandse9, Jessica Overweg9, Myrthe Faber10, Margreet van Koert11, Nafsika Smith12, Maigi Vija13, Sirli Zupping13, Sari Kunnari14, Tiffany Morisseau15, Manana Rusieshvili16, Kazuko Yatsushiro17, Anja Fengler18, Spyridoula Varlokosta19, Katerina Konstantzou19, Shira Farby20, Maria Teresa Guasti21, Mirta Vernice21, Reiko Okabe22, Miwa Isobe23, Peter Crosthwaite24, Yoonjee Hong25, Ingrida Balčiūnienė26, Yanti Marina Ahmad Nizar7, Helen Grech27, Daniela Gatt27, Win Nee Cheong28, Arve Asbjørnsen29, Janne von Koss Torkildsen30, Ewa Haman31, Aneta Miękisz31, Natalia Gagarina17, Julia Puzanova32, Darinka Anđelković33, Maja Savić33, Smiljana Jošić33, Daniela Slančová34, Svetlana Kapalková35, Tania Barberán3, Duygu Özge36, Saima Hassan37, Cecilia Yuet Hung Chan38, Tomoya Okubo39, Heather van der Lely40, Uli Sauerland17, Ira Noveck15.   

Abstract

Learners of most languages are faced with the task of acquiring words to talk about number and quantity. Much is known about the order of acquisition of number words as well as the cognitive and perceptual systems and cultural practices that shape it. Substantially less is known about the acquisition of quantifiers. Here, we consider the extent to which systems and practices that support number word acquisition can be applied to quantifier acquisition and conclude that the two domains are largely distinct in this respect. Consequently, we hypothesize that the acquisition of quantifiers is constrained by a set of factors related to each quantifier's specific meaning. We investigate competence with the expressions for "all," "none," "some," "some…not," and "most" in 31 languages, representing 11 language types, by testing 768 5-y-old children and 536 adults. We found a cross-linguistically similar order of acquisition of quantifiers, explicable in terms of four factors relating to their meaning and use. In addition, exploratory analyses reveal that language- and learner-specific factors, such as negative concord and gender, are significant predictors of variation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  language acquisition; pragmatics; quantifiers; semantics; universals

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27482119      PMCID: PMC4995931          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1601341113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  18 in total

1.  Number words, quantifiers, and principles of word learning.

Authors:  Jessica Sullivan; David Barner
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-02-15

2.  Diversity. Gender similarities characterize math performance.

Authors:  Janet S Hyde; Sara M Lindberg; Marcia C Linn; Amy B Ellis; Caroline C Williams
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Cross-linguistic relations between quantifiers and numerals in language acquisition: evidence from Japanese.

Authors:  David Barner; Amanda Libenson; Pierina Cheung; Mayu Takasaki
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2009-01-21

4.  Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation.

Authors:  Tanya Stivers; N J Enfield; Penelope Brown; Christina Englert; Makoto Hayashi; Trine Heinemann; Gertie Hoymann; Federico Rossano; Jan Peter de Ruiter; Kyung-Eun Yoon; Stephen C Levinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The generative basis of natural number concepts.

Authors:  Alan M Leslie; Rochel Gelman; C R Gallistel
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Linguistic cues in the acquisition of number words.

Authors:  P Bloom; K Wynn
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  1997-10

7.  Are children with Specific Language Impairment competent with the pragmatics and logic of quantification?

Authors:  Napoleon Katsos; Clara Andrés Roqueta; Rosa Ana Clemente Estevan; Chris Cummins
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-01-14

8.  When children are more logical than adults: experimental investigations of scalar implicature.

Authors:  I A Noveck
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2001-02

9.  Grammatical morphology as a source of early number word meanings.

Authors:  Alhanouf Almoammer; Jessica Sullivan; Chris Donlan; Franc Marušič; Rok Žaucer; Timothy O'Donnell; David Barner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Sex differences in neural processing of language among children.

Authors:  Douglas D Burman; Tali Bitan; James R Booth
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  3 in total

1.  Probabilistic pragmatics explains gradience and focality in natural language quantification.

Authors:  Bob van Tiel; Michael Franke; Uli Sauerland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Some Pieces Are Missing: Implicature Production in Children.

Authors:  Sarah F V Eiteljoerge; Nausicaa Pouscoulous; Elena V M Lieven
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-10-24

3.  Quantifier comprehension is linked to linguistic rather than to numerical skills. Evidence from children with Down syndrome and Williams syndrome.

Authors:  Sarah Dolscheid; Martina Penke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.