Literature DB >> 18468277

Determining individual preschoolers' preferences in a group arrangement.

Stacy A Layer1, Gregory P Hanley, Nicole A Heal, Jeffrey H Tiger.   

Abstract

This study sought to determine the accuracy of an assessment format in which selection outcomes were delayed and probabilistic; these are unavoidable features of an assessment designed to determine preferences of multiple children simultaneously. During the single arrangement, preference hierarchies were established by having a child repeatedly select from among several foods and by sequentially restricting preferred items from the array. After being taught the associations between colored cards and the same food items, group assessments were conducted with 3 children simultaneously, in which each child chose a card and all children received the food correlated with a randomly selected card from those that had just been selected. The group assessment appeared to be accurate and perhaps more efficient for determining preferences; thus, we posit that this arrangement is suitable for determining context preferences of multiple children simultaneously.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18468277      PMCID: PMC2410191          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  18 in total

Review 1.  Interaction effects in multielement designs: inevitable, desirable, and ignorable.

Authors:  A H Hains; D M Baer
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1989

2.  Preference for free choice over forced choice in pigeons.

Authors:  A C Catania; T Sagvolden
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Tests of behavioral-economic assessments of relative reinforcer efficacy: economic substitutes.

Authors:  Gregory J Madden; John R Smethells; Eric E Ewan; Steven R Hursh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.

Authors:  H S Roane; T R Vollmer; J E Ringdahl; B A Marcus
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1998

5.  Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; B A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996

6.  Evaluation of client preference for function-based treatment packages.

Authors:  G P Hanley; C C Piazza; W W Fisher; S A Contrucci; K A Maglieri
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1997

7.  Preference testing: a comparison of two presentation methods.

Authors:  J Windsor; L M Piché; P A Locke
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec

8.  Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.

Authors:  G M Pace; M T Ivancic; G L Edwards; B A Iwata; T J Page
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1985

9.  Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior.

Authors:  D V Cicchetti; S A Sparrow
Journal:  Am J Ment Defic       Date:  1981-09

10.  Evaluating preschool children's preferences for motivational systems during instruction.

Authors:  Nicole A Heal; Gregory P Hanley
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2007
View more
  1 in total

1.  Toward effective and preferred programming: a case for the objective measurement of social validity with recipients of behavior-change programs.

Authors:  Gregory P Hanley
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2010
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.