Literature DB >> 20019177

The apparent increase in the {beta}-parameter of the linear quadratic model with increased linear energy transfer during fast neutron irradiation.

B Jones1.   

Abstract

The issue of whether the beta-parameter of the linear quadratic model changes with linear energy transfer (LET) remains controversial. Retrospective analysis of UK fast neutron experimental data using human cell lines at Clatterbridge shows that the beta-parameter of the linear quadratic model probably does increase with LET during neutron irradiation. For cells without a deficiency in DNA damage repair and for experiments in which beta-parameter estimates were considered to be unreliably low, a provisional relationship of beta(H) = 1.82 beta(L) was found (where the suffixes refer to high and low LET exposures, respectively). This implies that radicalbeta increases by around 1.35 in the specific case of 62.5 MeV neutrons relative to 4 MeV X-rays. Increments in the beta-parameter with LET influence the relative biological effect (RBE), especially at high doses per fraction. Large fractions are being used in experimental carbon ion therapy, in which broadly similar RBE values to fast neutrons are found. These interesting findings after fast neutron exposure need to be studied further for applications in charged particle beam therapy using light ions, which is presently undergoing a worldwide expansion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20019177      PMCID: PMC3473575          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/68792966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  13 in total

1.  The inherent cellular sensitivity to 62.5 MeV(p----Be+) neutrons of human cells differing in photon sensitivity.

Authors:  R A Britten; H M Warenius; C Parkins; J H Peacock
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.694

2.  The incorporation of the concept of minimum RBE (RbEmin) into the linear-quadratic model and the potential for improved radiobiological analysis of high-LET treatments.

Authors:  Alejandro Carabe-Fernandez; Roger G Dale; Bleddyn Jones
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.694

3.  Calculation of high-LET radiotherapy dose required for compensation of overall treatment time extensions.

Authors:  B Jones; A Carabe-Fernandez; R G Dale
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Radioprotection by DMSO of mammalian cells exposed to X-rays and to heavy charged-particle beams.

Authors:  J D Chapman; S D Doern; A P Reuvers; C J Gillespie; A Chatterjee; E A Blakely; K C Smith; C A Tobias
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1979-02-23       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Dose fractionation schedules--biologic aspects and applications to high LET radiotherapy.

Authors:  J F Fowler
Journal:  J Can Assoc Radiol       Date:  1975-03

6.  Radiobiological characterization of the inactivating events produced in mammalian cells by helium and heavy ions.

Authors:  J D Chapman; E A Blakely; K C Smith; R C Urtasun
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 7.  The case for particle therapy.

Authors:  B Jones
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Mouse skin reactions following fractionated irradiation with carbon ions.

Authors:  K Ando; S Koike; K Nojima; Y J Chen; C Ohira; S Ando; N Kobayashi; T Ohbuchi; W Shimizu; T Kanai
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.694

9.  Clinical Results of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy at NIRS.

Authors:  Hirohiko Tsujii; Junetsu Mizoe; Tadashi Kamada; Masayuki Baba; Hiroshi Tsuji; Hirotoshi Kato; Shingo Kato; Shigeru Yamada; Shigeo Yasuda; Tatsuya Ohno; Takeshi Yanagi; Reiko Imai; Kenji Kagei; Hiroyuki Kato; Ryusuke Hara; Azusa Hasegawa; Mio Nakajima; Norio Sugane; Noriaki Tamaki; Ryo Takagi; Susumu Kandatsu; Kyosan Yoshikawa; Riwa Kishimoto; Tadaaki Miyamoto
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.724

10.  The potential clinical advantages of charged particle radiotherapy using protons or light ions.

Authors:  B Jones
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 4.126

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Proton RBE dependence on dose in the setting of hypofractionation.

Authors:  Thomas Friedrich
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Theoretical implications of incorporating relative biological effectiveness into radiobiological equivalence relationships.

Authors:  R P Holloway; R G Dale
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Fast neutron relative biological effects and implications for charged particle therapy.

Authors:  B Jones; T S A Underwood; A Carabe-Fernandez; C Timlin; R G Dale
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Why RBE must be a variable and not a constant in proton therapy.

Authors:  Bleddyn Jones
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  The evolution of practical radiobiological modelling.

Authors:  B Jones; R G Dale
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Dilemmas concerning dose distribution and the influence of relative biological effect in proton beam therapy of medulloblastoma.

Authors:  B Jones; P Wilson; A Nagano; J Fenwick; G McKenna
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Towards Achieving the Full Clinical Potential of Proton Therapy by Inclusion of LET and RBE Models.

Authors:  Bleddyn Jones
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 8.  Effects of Charged Particles on Human Tumor Cells.

Authors:  Kathryn D Held; Hidemasa Kawamura; Takuya Kaminuma; Athena Evalour S Paz; Yukari Yoshida; Qi Liu; Henning Willers; Akihisa Takahashi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Systematic analysis of RBE and related quantities using a database of cell survival experiments with ion beam irradiation.

Authors:  Thomas Friedrich; Uwe Scholz; Thilo Elsässer; Marco Durante; Michael Scholz
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 2.724

10.  A Simpler Energy Transfer Efficiency Model to Predict Relative Biological Effect for Protons and Heavier Ions.

Authors:  Bleddyn Jones
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 6.244

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.