Felix W Leung1. 1. Sepulveda Ambulatory Care Center, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, North Hills, CA 91343, USA. felix.leung@va.gov
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the United States, colonoscopy is usually performed under sedation. In practice, 2.3-7% actually requested unsedated colonoscopy and 1.4% received it because of no escorts. Efforts to increase usage would likely require increased patient counseling and education. AIM: We tested the hypothesis that knowledge conveyed by education-a key attribute of patient-centered care-is associated with acceptance of the "non-usual" option. METHODS: After patients underwent discussions and expressed acceptance of sedated colonoscopy, the pros and cons of and local experience with unsedated colonoscopy were added. The patients who changed from accepting sedated to unsedated colonoscopy and outcomes of their examinations were recorded. RESULTS: From January to November 2006, 49 of 176 consecutive patients (28%) changed their choice from sedated to unsedated colonoscopy after being informed of the latter. Forty-eight had satisfactory bowel preparation. Cecal intubation rate was 93.7% (45 of 48). Thirty-six reported good experience and 43, likely to repeat. Cecal intubation, withdrawal, and discharge times were 23.0 +/- 1.4 min, 15.0 +/- 1.0 min, and 5.0 +/- 0.5 min, respectively (n = 45). Ability to communicate with the colonoscopist during and after the examination was the most frequently ranked reason for choosing unsedated colonoscopy. CONCLUSION: Our uncontrolled, non-randomized, single-site observational data revealed that for selected veterans, acceptance of unsedated colonoscopy coincides with knowledge of the option dispensed by patient counseling and education.
BACKGROUND: In the United States, colonoscopy is usually performed under sedation. In practice, 2.3-7% actually requested unsedated colonoscopy and 1.4% received it because of no escorts. Efforts to increase usage would likely require increased patient counseling and education. AIM: We tested the hypothesis that knowledge conveyed by education-a key attribute of patient-centered care-is associated with acceptance of the "non-usual" option. METHODS: After patients underwent discussions and expressed acceptance of sedated colonoscopy, the pros and cons of and local experience with unsedated colonoscopy were added. The patients who changed from accepting sedated to unsedated colonoscopy and outcomes of their examinations were recorded. RESULTS: From January to November 2006, 49 of 176 consecutive patients (28%) changed their choice from sedated to unsedated colonoscopy after being informed of the latter. Forty-eight had satisfactory bowel preparation. Cecal intubation rate was 93.7% (45 of 48). Thirty-six reported good experience and 43, likely to repeat. Cecal intubation, withdrawal, and discharge times were 23.0 +/- 1.4 min, 15.0 +/- 1.0 min, and 5.0 +/- 0.5 min, respectively (n = 45). Ability to communicate with the colonoscopist during and after the examination was the most frequently ranked reason for choosing unsedated colonoscopy. CONCLUSION: Our uncontrolled, non-randomized, single-site observational data revealed that for selected veterans, acceptance of unsedated colonoscopy coincides with knowledge of the option dispensed by patient counseling and education.
Authors: Cynthia W Ko; Stacy Riffle; Jean A Shapiro; Michael D Saunders; Scott D Lee; Bruce Y Tung; Rahul Kuver; Anne M Larson; Kris V Kowdley; Michael B Kimmey Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2006-12-14 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Axel Eickhoff; Jacques van Dam; Ralf Jakobs; Valerie Kudis; Dirk Hartmann; Ulrich Damian; Uwe Weickert; Dieter Schilling; Jürgen F Riemann Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2006-12-11 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Steven H Woolf; Evelyn C Y Chan; Russell Harris; Stacey L Sheridan; Clarence H Braddock; Robert M Kaplan; Alex Krist; Annette M O'Connor; Sean Tunis Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2005-08-16 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Felix W Leung; Surinder K Mann; Rodelei Salera; Lee Toomsen; Hazel Cabrera; Dannie Prather; Rebeck Gutierrez; Joseph W Leung Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2008-02-14 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Fw Leung; Jo Harker; Jw Leung; Rm Siao-Salera; Sk Mann; Fc Ramirez; S Friedland; A Amato; F Radaelli; S Paggi; V Terruzzi; Yh Hsieh Journal: J Interv Gastroenterol Date: 2011-07-01
Authors: Fw Leung; Jo Harker; Jw Leung; Rm Siao-Salera; Sk Mann; Fc Ramirez; S Friedland; A Amato; F Radaelli; S Paggi; V Terruzzi; Yh Hsieh Journal: J Interv Gastroenterol Date: 2011-07-01
Authors: Fw Leung; R Cheung; Rs Fan; Ls Fischer; S Friedland; Sb Ho; Yh Hsieh; I Hung; Mk Li; S Matsui; Kr McQuaid; G Ohning; A Ojuri; T Sato; Ak Shergill; Ma Shoham; Tc Simons; Mh Walter; A Yen Journal: J Interv Gastroenterol Date: 2012-07-01
Authors: Felix W Leung; Joseph W Leung; Surinder K Mann; Shai Friedland; Francisco C Ramirez; Snorri Olafsson Journal: J Interv Gastroenterol Date: 2011-04
Authors: Donald J Portocarrero; Kendrick Che; Snorri Olafsson; Michael H Walter; Christian S Jackson; Felix W Leung; Ariel Malamud Journal: J Interv Gastroenterol Date: 2012-01-01