Unsedated colonoscopy introduced to ensure access is acceptable to a subgroup of veterans.

BACKGROUND: Nurses for monitoring and recovery are required for sedated colonoscopy. A nursing shortage necessitated discontinuation of sedated colonoscopy at a VA academic training program. AIM: Elements of a case series that documented acceptance of unsedated colonoscopy are reviewed to raise awareness of the feasibility of this option.
METHOD: The pros and cons of sedation and no sedation were summarized. After discussion, patients who chose the unsedated option were scheduled for examination locally while those who desired sedation were scheduled at another VA site. Colonoscopy was performed by supervised trainees.
RESULTS: From September 2002 to June 2005 scheduled unsedated colonoscopy was accepted by 145 of 483 veterans. Cecal intubation was achieved in 81%. Thus, of the cohort 30% had local access to and 24% completed unsedated colonoscopy. Implementation of unsedated colonoscopy obviated the need for two registered nurses previously required for sedated colonoscopy.
CONCLUSION: Unsedated colonoscopy offered as an option to ensure access was acceptable to a subgroup of our veteran patients. Implementation required less nursing resources. Techniques to enhance the cecal intubation rate of unsedated colonoscopy performed by supervised trainees deserves to be assessed in future studies.