Literature DB >> 17173914

Incidence of minor complications and time lost from normal activities after screening or surveillance colonoscopy.

Cynthia W Ko1, Stacy Riffle, Jean A Shapiro, Michael D Saunders, Scott D Lee, Bruce Y Tung, Rahul Kuver, Anne M Larson, Kris V Kowdley, Michael B Kimmey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies address the development of minor complications after screening or surveillance colonoscopy.
OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to examine in previously asymptomatic people the incidence of new symptoms after colonoscopy, risk factors for symptoms, and patients' perceptions of this examination.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. Patients completed a standardized interview at 7 and 30 days after colonoscopy. PATIENTS: A total of 502 patients aged 40 years and older undergoing colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening, surveillance, or follow-up of another abnormal screening test result. Patients were excluded if they had a history of inflammatory bowel disease, visible GI bleeding, or anemia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of minor complications and patient perceptions about colonoscopy.
RESULTS: Minor complications occurred in 162 subjects (34%) before day 7 and in 29 subjects (6%) between day 7 and day 30, most commonly bloating (25%) and abdominal pain (11%). Six subjects had unexpected emergency department visits or hospitalizations within 30 days, including 2 with postpolypectomy bleeding. On multivariate analysis, minor complications were more common in women (odds ratio 1.78, 95% CI 1.21-2.62) and when the procedure lasted 20 minutes or longer. Bowel preparation was rated the most difficult part of the examination for 77%. Most subjects (94%) lost 2 or fewer days from normal activities for the colonoscopy itself, preparation, or recovery.
CONCLUSIONS: Minor complications were common after screening and surveillance colonoscopy. The bowel preparation was the most difficult part of the examination for most patients. Most subjects lost 2 or fewer days from normal activities because of colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17173914     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.06.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  46 in total

Review 1.  Adverse events in older patients undergoing colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lukejohn W Day; Annette Kwon; John M Inadomi; Louise C Walter; Ma Somsouk
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Prospective description of coughing, hemodynamic changes, and oxygen desaturation during endoscopic sedation.

Authors:  Abdul Hamid El Chafic; George Eckert; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Screening options and recommendations for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Timothy M Geiger; Rocco Ricciardi
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2009-11

Review 4.  FIT testing: an overview.

Authors:  Lukejohn W Day; Taft Bhuket; James Allison
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2013-11

5.  Prospective, controlled assessment of the impact of formal evidence-based medicine teaching workshop on ability to appraise the medical literature.

Authors:  G C Harewood; L M Hendrick
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Minor adverse events postcolonoscopy.

Authors:  Catherine Dubé
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-12

Review 7.  Complications during colonoscopy: prevention, diagnosis, and management.

Authors:  R Manta; F Tremolaterra; A Arezzo; M Verra; G Galloro; L Dioscoridi; F Pugliese; A Zullo; M Mutignani; G Bassotti
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Prospective Analysis of Minor Adverse Events After Colon Polypectomy.

Authors:  Soo-Kyung Park; Min-Gu Lee; Seok Hyeon Jeong; Hyo-Joon Yang; Yoon Suk Jung; Kyu Yong Choi; Hungdai Kim; Hyung Ook Kim; Kyung Uk Jeong; Ho-Kyung Chun; Dong Il Park
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Split dose and MiraLAX-based purgatives to enhance bowel preparation quality becoming common recommendations in the US.

Authors:  Grace Clarke Hillyer; Benjamin Lebwohl; Corey H Basch; Charles E Basch; Fay Kastrinos; Beverly J Insel; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.409

10.  Pilot feasibility study of the method of water infusion without air insufflation in sedated colonoscopy.

Authors:  Joseph W Leung; Rodolei Salera; Lee Toomsen; Surinder Mann; Felix W Leung
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.