Literature DB >> 18456923

Learning to perceive differences in solid shape through vision and touch.

J Farley Norman1, Anna Marie Clayton, Hideko F Norman, Charles E Crabtree.   

Abstract

A single experiment was designed to investigate perceptual learning and the discrimination of 3-D object shape. Ninety-six observers were presented with naturally shaped solid objects either visually, haptically, or across the modalities of vision and touch. The observers' task was to judge whether the two sequentially presented objects on any given trial possessed the same or different 3-D shapes. The results of the experiment revealed that significant perceptual learning occurred in all modality conditions, both unimodal and cross-modal. The amount of the observers' perceptual learning, as indexed by increases in hit rate and d', was similar for all of the modality conditions. The observers' hit rates were highest for the unimodal conditions and lowest in the cross-modal conditions. Lengthening the inter-stimulus interval from 3 to 15 s led to increases in hit rates and decreases in response bias. The results also revealed the existence of an asymmetry between two otherwise equivalent cross-modal conditions: in particular, the observers' perceptual sensitivity was higher for the vision-haptic condition and lower for the haptic-vision condition. In general, the results indicate that effective cross-modal shape comparisons can be made between the modalities of vision and active touch, but that complete information transfer does not occur.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18456923     DOI: 10.1068/p5679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  14 in total

1.  Categorizing natural objects: a comparison of the visual and the haptic modalities.

Authors:  Nina Gaissert; Christian Wallraven
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Crossmodal enhancement in the LOC for visuohaptic object recognition over development.

Authors:  R Joanne Jao; Thomas W James; Karin Harman James
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Haptic perception disambiguates visual perception of 3D shape.

Authors:  Maarten W A Wijntjes; Robert Volcic; Sylvia C Pont; Jan J Koenderink; Astrid M L Kappers
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Can you hear shapes you touch?

Authors:  Jung-Kyong Kim; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Cross-modal visuo-haptic mental rotation: comparing objects between senses.

Authors:  Robert Volcic; Maarten W A Wijntjes; Erik C Kool; Astrid M L Kappers
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Haptic guidance of overt visual attention.

Authors:  Alexandra List; Lucica Iordanescu; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Perceptual learning of view-independence in visuo-haptic object representations.

Authors:  Simon Lacey; Marisa Pappas; Alexandra Kreps; Kevin Lee; K Sathian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-31       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Grasping with the eyes of your hands: hapsis and vision modulate hand preference.

Authors:  Kayla D Stone; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Aging and the haptic perception of 3D surface shape.

Authors:  J Farley Norman; Astrid M L Kappers; Amanda M Beers; A Kate Scott; Hideko F Norman; Jan J Koenderink
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Touching on face space: comparing visual and haptic processing of face shapes.

Authors:  Christian Wallraven
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.