Literature DB >> 23073811

Apical root resorption in maxillary incisors when employing micro-implant and J-hook headgear anchorage: a 4-month radiographic study.

Qingzhu Wang1, Wenjing Chen2, Roger J Smales3, Hui Peng1, Xiaokun Hu1, Lu Yin4.   

Abstract

This study evaluated, over a 4-month study period, the amount of apical root resorption occurring in maxillary central incisors following their retraction when employing either micro-implant or J-hook headgear anchorage. The prospective randomised clinical trial was conducted in Orthodontic Clinic, College of Stomatology, China from 2008-2009. Subjects are patients requiring fixed appliances on waiting list (n=20). In female Han Chinese patients aged from 16-26 years, standardized periapical radiographs from 10 randomly assigned patients with maxillary protrusions comprising the micro-implant group, and from 10 similar patients comprising the J-hook headgear group, were assessed for maxillary central incisor apical root resorption. Measurements before and after orthodontic therapy were also obtained from lateral cephalometric radiographs to calculate incisor horizontal retraction and vertical intrusion distances. Estimated retraction force vectors were calculated in horizontal and vertical directions for both treatment groups. Data analysis employed t-tests and the Pearson correlation test, with α=0.05 for statistical significance. The results showed that when compared with the J-hook group, significantly more apical root resorption shortening of the maxillary central incisors was observed in the micro-implant group (1.27 mm difference, 95% CI=0.70-1.84, P<0.001), which was associated with a significantly larger retraction distance (P=0.004) and a smaller vertical force component (P<0.0001). We are led to conclude that continuous activation of the nickel-titanium coil springs used in the micro-implant group resulted in significantly more apical root resorption shortening and maxillary central incisor retraction than when intermittent J-hook retraction was employed. The employment of continuous duration orthodontic forces presents a risk for increased apical root resorption that requires careful radiographic monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23073811     DOI: 10.1007/s11596-012-1032-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci        ISSN: 1672-0733


  26 in total

1.  Apical root resorption six and 12 months after initiation of fixed orthodontic appliance therapy.

Authors:  Jon Artun; Isolde Smale; Faraj Behbehani; Diane Doppel; Martin Van't Hof; Anne M Kuijpers-Jagtman
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  [Investigation of the possible factors related to root resorption during orthodontic treatment in adolescents].

Authors:  Yan Lin; Ping-Ping Zhong; Duan-Qiang Zhang
Journal:  Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue       Date:  2007-02

Review 3.  Root resorption and orthodontic treatment. Review of the literature.

Authors:  G Pizzo; M E Licata; R Guiglia; G Giuliana
Journal:  Minerva Stomatol       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb

Review 4.  Risk factors of root resorption after orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Kristina Lopatiene; Aiste Dumbravaite
Journal:  Stomatologija       Date:  2008

5.  Apical root resorption in upper anterior teeth.

Authors:  B O Linge; L Linge
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Ultrastructure of cementum and periodontal ligament after continuous intrusion in humans: a transmission electron microscopy study.

Authors:  R M Faltin; K Faltin; F G Sander; V E Arana-Chavez
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  A radiographic comparison of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment with a standard edgewise and a straight-wire edgewise technique.

Authors:  M Mavragani; A Vergari; N J Selliseth; O E Bøe; P L Wisth
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Comparison of the intrusion effects on the maxillary incisors between implant anchorage and J-hook headgear.

Authors:  Toru Deguchi; Takashi Murakami; Shingo Kuroda; Toshinori Yabuuchi; Hiroshi Kamioka; Teruko Takano-Yamamoto
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  [Comparison between J-hook and micro-implant anchorage in the treatment of patients with bimaxillary protrusion].

Authors:  Wen-Jing Chen; Qing-Yi Li; Ai-Xiu Gong; Fang Hu; Yong-Jia Gu
Journal:  Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2008-02

Review 10.  Orthodontic tooth movement and root resorption with special reference to force magnitude and duration. A clinical and histological investigation in adolescents.

Authors:  P Owman-Moll
Journal:  Swed Dent J Suppl       Date:  1995
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.