Literature DB >> 18450072

"Artificial grammar learning" in pigeons: a preliminary analysis.

Walter T Herbranson1, Charles P Shimp.   

Abstract

An avian analogue to human artificial or synthetic grammar learning (Reber, 1967) was developed. Pigeons viewed horizontal strings of three to eight colored letters. These strings either conformed to Reber's artificial grammar or violated it in one or two locations. Pigeons categorized the letter strings as grammatical (left keypeck) or nongrammatical (right keypeck). Overall accuracy of categorization was above chance to both familiar training strings and to novel transfer strings, thereby satisfying a conventional criterion for learning an abstract concept. The results support a multiple mechanisms point of view according to which pigeons, like humans, learn both abstract concepts and specific strings, or specific parts of strings, in artificial grammar learning tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 18450072     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  19 in total

1.  Tolerance in a rigorous science.

Authors:  C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Behavior as a social construction.

Authors:  C P. Shimp
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2001-05-03       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Dynamic shifts of pigeon local/global attention.

Authors:  Thane Fremouw; Walter T Herbranson; Charles P Shimp
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2002-10-08       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 4.  Toward a method of selecting among computational models of cognition.

Authors:  Mark A Pitt; In Jae Myung; Shaobo Zhang
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Implicit and explicit knowledge bases in artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  Z Dienes; D Broadbent; D Berry
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Natural concepts in pigeons.

Authors:  R J Hernstein; D H Loveland; C Cable
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1976-10

7.  A behavioral look at the training of Alex: A review of Pepperberg's the Alex studies: Cognitive and communicative abilities of grey parrots.

Authors:  Bruce E Hesse; Bill Potter
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2004

8.  In the beginning was the "name".

Authors:  H S Terrace
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1985-09

9.  Rule-based and exemplar-based classification in artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  M P McAndrews; M Moscovitch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-09

10.  The randomization procedure in the study of categorization of multidimensional stimuli by pigeons.

Authors:  W T Herbranson; T Fremouw; C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1999-01
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Revisiting the syntactic abilities of non-human animals: natural vocalizations and artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  Carel ten Cate; Kazuo Okanoya
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Artificial grammar learning in pigeons.

Authors:  Walter T Herbranson; Charles P Shimp
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Development of implicit and explicit category learning.

Authors:  Cynthia L Huang-Pollock; W Todd Maddox; Sarah L Karalunas
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2011-03-05

4.  Toward the Unification of Molecular and Molar Analyses.

Authors:  Charles P Shimp
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2013

5.  Artificial grammar learning in tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) in varying stimulus contexts.

Authors:  Julie J Neiworth; Justin M London; Michael J Flynn; Deborah D Rupert; Owen Alldritt; Caleb Hyde
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.231

6.  Individual behavior in learning of an artificial grammar.

Authors:  Vitor C Zimmerer; Patricia E Cowell; Rosemary A Varley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-04

7.  Visual artificial grammar learning: comparative research on humans, kea (Nestor notabilis) and pigeons (Columba livia).

Authors:  Nina Stobbe; Gesche Westphal-Fitch; Ulrike Aust; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Implicit chaining in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) with elements equated for probability of reinforcement.

Authors:  Charles Locurto; Laura Dillon; Meaghan Collins; Maura Conway; Kate Cunningham
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Targets for a comparative neurobiology of language.

Authors:  Justin T Kiggins; Jordan A Comins; Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  Front Evol Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-09

10.  Processing advantages for consonance: A comparison between rats (Rattus norvegicus) and humans (Homo sapiens).

Authors:  Paola Crespo-Bojorque; Juan M Toro
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 2.231

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.