Literature DB >> 28018041

Toward the Unification of Molecular and Molar Analyses.

Charles P Shimp1.   

Abstract

Three categories of behavior analysis may be called molecular, molar, and unified. Molecular analyses focus on how manual shaping segments moment-to-moment behaving into new, unified, hierarchically organized patterns. Manual shaping is largely atheoretical, qualitative, and practical. Molar analyses aggregate behaviors and then compute a numerical average for the aggregate. Typical molar analyses involve average rate of, or average time allocated to, the aggregated behaviors. Some molar analyses have no known relation to any behavior stream. Molar analyses are usually quantitative and often theoretical. Unified analyses combine automated shaping of moment-to-moment behaving and molar aggregates of the shaped patterns. Unified controlling relations suggest that molar controlling relations like matching confound shaping and strengthening effects of reinforcement. If a molecular analysis is about how reinforcement organizes individual behavior moment by moment, and a molar analysis is about how reinforcement encourages more or less of an activity aggregated over time, then a unified analysis handles both kinds of analyses. Only theories engendered by computer simulation appear to be able to unify all three categories of behavior analysis.

Keywords:  computer theory; molar analysis; molecular analysis; shaping; unification

Year:  2013        PMID: 28018041      PMCID: PMC5147445          DOI: 10.1007/bf03392316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Anal        ISSN: 0738-6729


  44 in total

1.  From molecular to molar: a paradigm shift in behavior analysis.

Authors:  William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The dependence of interresponse times upon the relative reinforcement of different interresponse times.

Authors:  D ANGER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1956-09

3.  Shaping in the 21st century: Moving percentile schedules into applied settings.

Authors:  G Galbicka
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1994

4.  The reinforcement of four interresponse times in a two-alternative situation.

Authors:  C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Time allocation and response rate.

Authors:  C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Synthetic variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Dynamics of choice: a tutorial.

Authors:  William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Molar function depends on molecular structure of behavior.

Authors:  C P Shimp; T Fremouw; L M Ingebritsen; K A Long
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1994-01

10.  "Artificial grammar learning" in pigeons: a preliminary analysis.

Authors:  Walter T Herbranson; Charles P Shimp
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.986

View more
  3 in total

1.  On Multiscaled and Unified.

Authors:  Raymond C Pitts
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2013

2.  Current Diversification of Behaviorism.

Authors:  Sho Araiba
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2019-06-10

3.  Relational Behavior and ACT: A Dynamic Relationship.

Authors:  Jordan Belisle; Mark R Dixon
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2021-07-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.