Literature DB >> 21264600

Individual behavior in learning of an artificial grammar.

Vitor C Zimmerer1, Patricia E Cowell, Rosemary A Varley.   

Abstract

Artificial grammar learning (AGL) is a widely used experimental paradigm that investigates how syntactic structures are processed. After a familiarization phase, participants have to distinguish strings consistent with a set of grammatical rules from strings that violate these rules. Many experiments report performance solely at a group level and as the total number of correct judgments. This report describes a systematic approach for investigating individual performance and a range of different behaviors. Participants were exposed to strings of the nonfinite grammar A( n )B( n ). To distinguish grammatical from ungrammatical strings, participants had to pay attention to local dependencies while comparing the number of stimuli from each class. Individual participants showed substantially different behavioral patterns despite exposure to the same stimuli. The results were replicated across auditory and visual sensory modalities. It is suggested that an analysis that looks at individual differences grants new insights into the processes involved in AGL. It also provides a solid basis from which to investigate sequence-processing abilities in special populations, such as patients with neurological lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21264600     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-010-0039-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  24 in total

1.  Preserved implicit learning on both the serial reaction time task and artificial grammar in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  J Smith; R J Siegert; J McDowall; D Abernethy
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  The role of similarity in artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  E M Pothos; T M Bailey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Computational constraints on syntactic processing in a nonhuman primate.

Authors:  W Tecumseh Fitch; Marc D Hauser
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-01-16       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Does the mastery of center-embedded linguistic structures distinguish humans from nonhuman primates?

Authors:  Pierre Perruchet; Arnaud Rey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-04

5.  Syntactic determinants of sentence comprehension in aphasia.

Authors:  D Caplan; C Baker; F Dehaut
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1985-11

6.  Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds.

Authors:  Timothy Q Gentner; Kimberly M Fenn; Daniel Margoliash; Howard C Nusbaum
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults.

Authors:  J R Saffran; E K Johnson; R N Aslin; E L Newport
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-02-01

8.  Segmentation of the speech stream in a non-human primate: statistical learning in cotton-top tamarins.

Authors:  M D Hauser; E L Newport; R N Aslin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2001-03

9.  The faculty of language: what's special about it?

Authors:  Steven Pinker; Ray Jackendoff
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-03

10.  "Artificial grammar learning" in pigeons: a preliminary analysis.

Authors:  Walter T Herbranson; Charles P Shimp
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.986

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Revisiting the syntactic abilities of non-human animals: natural vocalizations and artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  Carel ten Cate; Kazuo Okanoya
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  The necessity of the medial temporal lobe for statistical learning.

Authors:  Anna C Schapiro; Emma Gregory; Barbara Landau; Michael McCloskey; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Sequential learning in individuals with agrammatic aphasia: evidence from artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  Julia Schuchard; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  J Cogn Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2017-02-17

4.  Visual artificial grammar learning: comparative research on humans, kea (Nestor notabilis) and pigeons (Columba livia).

Authors:  Nina Stobbe; Gesche Westphal-Fitch; Ulrike Aust; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  More than one way to see it: Individual heuristics in avian visual computation.

Authors:  Andrea Ravignani; Gesche Westphal-Fitch; Ulrike Aust; Martin M Schlumpp; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-06-22

6.  Baboons (Papio papio) Process a Context-Free but Not a Context-Sensitive Grammar.

Authors:  Raphaëlle Malassis; Stanislas Dehaene; Joël Fagot
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Collective phenomena and non-finite state computation in a human social system.

Authors:  Simon DeDeo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Preliminary Experiments on Human Sensitivity to Rhythmic Structure in a Grammar with Recursive Self-Similarity.

Authors:  Andreea Geambaşu; Andrea Ravignani; Clara C Levelt
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.677

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.