Literature DB >> 1834769

Implicit and explicit knowledge bases in artificial grammar learning.

Z Dienes1, D Broadbent, D Berry.   

Abstract

Two experiments examined the claim for distinct implicit and explicit learning modes in the artificial grammar-learning task (Reber, 1967, 1989). Subjects initially attempted to memorize strings of letters generated by a finite-state grammar and then classified new grammatical and nongrammatical strings. Experiment 1 showed that subjects' assessment of isolated parts of strings was sufficient to account for their classification performance but that the rules elicited in free report were not sufficient. Experiment 2 showed that performing a concurrent random number generation task under different priorities interfered with free report and classification performance equally. Furthermore, giving different groups of subjects incidental or intentional learning instructions did not affect classification or free report.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1834769     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.17.5.875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  28 in total

1.  The basis of transfer in artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  R L Gomez; L Gerken; R W Schvaneveldt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-03

2.  An examination of the effects of adult age on explicit and implicit learning of figural sequences.

Authors:  M A D'Eredita; W J Hoyer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-09

3.  Effects of divided attention and speeded responding on implicit and explicit retrieval of artificial grammar knowledge.

Authors:  Shaun Helman; Dianne C Berry
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-07

4.  Measuring unconscious knowledge: distinguishing structural knowledge and judgment knowledge.

Authors:  Zoltán Dienes; Ryan Scott
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-03-15

5.  Role of selective attention in artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  Daisuke Tanaka; Sachiko Kiyokawa; Ayumi Yamada; Zoltán Dienes; Kazuo Shigemasu
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-12

6.  Artificial grammar learning in pigeons.

Authors:  Walter T Herbranson; Charles P Shimp
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 7.  Combining fMRI and behavioral measures to examine the process of human learning.

Authors:  Elisabeth A Karuza; Lauren L Emberson; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 2.877

8.  Secondary-task effects on sequence learning.

Authors:  H Heuer; V Schmidtke
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1996

9.  Memory and learning for a novel written style.

Authors:  J Zervakis; D C Rubin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-07

10.  "Artificial grammar learning" in pigeons: a preliminary analysis.

Authors:  Walter T Herbranson; Charles P Shimp
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.