Literature DB >> 18447320

Protein quantification by isotope dilution mass spectrometry of proteolytic fragments: cleavage rate and accuracy.

Cristian G Arsene1, Rüdiger Ohlendorf, William Burkitt, Caroline Pritchard, André Henrion, Gavin O'Connor, David M Bunk, Bernd Güttler.   

Abstract

The practice of quantifying proteins by peptide fragments from enzymatic proteolysis (digestion) was assessed regarding accuracy, reliability, and uncertainty of the results attainable. Purified recombinant growth hormone (rhGH, 22 kDa isoform) was used as a model analyte. Two tryptic peptides from hGH, T6 and T12, were chosen to determine the amount of the protein in the original sample. Reference solutions of T6 and T12 (isotopically labeled forms), value assigned by quantitative amino acid analysis (AAA) after complete hydrolysis, were used as internal standards. The accuracy of protein quantification by fragments T6 and T12 was evaluated by comparison of peptide results to those obtained for the same rhGH sample by AAA. The rate of cleavage (and thus the experimental protocol used) turned out to be crucial to the quality of results in protein quantification using enzymatic fragments. Applying a protocol customarily found in (qualitative) bottom-up proteomics gave results significantly higher than the target value from AAA (+11% with T6 and +6% with T12). In contrast, using a modified protocol optimized for fast and complete hydrolysis, results were unbiased within the limits of uncertainty, while the time needed for completion of proteolysis was considerably reduced (30 min as compared to 1080-1200 min). The method assessed highlighted three important criteria deemed necessary for successful protein quantification using proteolysis-based mass spectrometry methods. These are the following: the requirement for both the selected peptides and labeled internal standard to be stable throughout digestion; the correct purity assignment to the selected peptide standards; the proof of equimolar release of the selected peptides. The combined (overall) uncertainty for protein quantification was established by combination of estimates obtained for individual components and found to be U = 4% for this example. This uncertainty is of the same order as that typically attainable in quantification of "small" organic molecules using liquid chromatography/isotope dilution mass spectrometry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18447320     DOI: 10.1021/ac7024738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  16 in total

1.  Nano-scale liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry and on-the-fly orthogonal array optimization for quantification of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies and the application in preclinical analysis.

Authors:  Xiaotao Duan; Lipeng Dai; Shang-Chiung Chen; Joseph P Balthasar; Jun Qu
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 4.759

2.  Multiple Reaction Monitoring Enables Precise Quantification of 97 Proteins in Dried Blood Spots.

Authors:  Andrew G Chambers; Andrew J Percy; Juncong Yang; Christoph H Borchers
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Establishing ion ratio thresholds based on absolute peak area for absolute protein quantification using protein cleavage isotope dilution mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Philip L Loziuk; Ronald R Sederoff; Vincent L Chiang; David C Muddiman
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 4.616

4.  Peptide production and decay rates affect the quantitative accuracy of protein cleavage isotope dilution mass spectrometry (PC-IDMS).

Authors:  Christopher M Shuford; Ronald R Sederoff; Vincent L Chiang; David C Muddiman
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 5.  Stable-isotope dilution LC–MS for quantitative biomarker analysis.

Authors:  Eugene Ciccimaro; Ian A Blair
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Quantitation of the dynamic profiles of the innate immune response using multiplex selected reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Yingxin Zhao; Bing Tian; Chukwudi B Edeh; Allan R Brasier
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 5.911

7.  A rapid, reproducible, on-the-fly orthogonal array optimization method for targeted protein quantification by LC/MS and its application for accurate and sensitive quantification of carbonyl reductases in human liver.

Authors:  Jin Cao; Vanessa Gonzalez-Covarrubias; Vanessa M Covarrubias; Robert M Straubinger; Hao Wang; Xiaotao Duan; Haoying Yu; Jun Qu; Javier G Blanco
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Absolute quantification of prion protein (90-231) using stable isotope-labeled chymotryptic peptide standards in a LC-MRM AQUA workflow.

Authors:  Robert Sturm; Gloria Sheynkman; Clarissa Booth; Lloyd M Smith; Joel A Pedersen; Lingjun Li
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 3.109

9.  High-throughput method development for sensitive, accurate, and reproducible quantification of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies in tissues using orthogonal array optimization and nano liquid chromatography/selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Xiaotao Duan; Lubna Abuqayyas; Lipeng Dai; Joseph P Balthasar; Jun Qu
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  Accelerated tryptic digestion of proteins in plasma for absolute quantitation using a protein internal standard by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Fumin Li; Claire M Schmerberg; Q C Ji
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.