Literature DB >> 22595788

Peptide production and decay rates affect the quantitative accuracy of protein cleavage isotope dilution mass spectrometry (PC-IDMS).

Christopher M Shuford1, Ronald R Sederoff, Vincent L Chiang, David C Muddiman.   

Abstract

No consensus has been reached on the proper time to add stable-isotope labeled (SIL) peptides in protein cleavage isotope dilution mass spectrometry workflows. While quantifying 24 monolignol pathway enzymes in the xylem tissue of Populus trichocarpa, we compared the protein concentrations obtained when adding the SIL standard peptides concurrently with the enzyme or after quenching of the digestion (i.e. postdigestion) and observed discrepancies for nearly all tryptic peptides investigated. In some cases, greater than 30-fold differences were observed. To explain these differences and potentially correct for them, we developed a mathematical model based on pseudo-first-order kinetics to account for the dynamic production and decay (e.g. degradation and precipitation) of the native peptide targets in conjunction with the decay of the SIL peptide standards. A time course study of the digests confirmed the results predicted by the proposed model and revealed that the discrepancy between concurrent and postdigestion introduction of the SIL standards was related to differential decay experienced by the SIL peptide and the native peptide in each method. Given these results, we propose concurrent introduction of the SIL peptide is most appropriate, though not free from bias. Mathematical modeling of this method reveals that overestimation of protein quantities would still result when rapid peptide decay occurs and that this bias would be further exaggerated by slow proteolysis. We derive a simple equation to estimate the bias for each peptide based on the relative rates of production and decay. According to this equation, nearly half of the peptides evaluated here were estimated to have quantitative errors greater than 10% and in a few cases over 100%. We conclude that the instability of peptides can often significantly bias the protein quantities measured in protein cleavage isotope dilution mass spectrometry-based assays and suggest peptide stability be made a priority when selecting peptides to use for quantification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22595788      PMCID: PMC3434783          DOI: 10.1074/mcp.O112.017145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics        ISSN: 1535-9476            Impact factor:   5.911


  26 in total

1.  Absolute quantification of the G protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin by LC/MS/MS using proteolysis product peptides and synthetic peptide standards.

Authors:  David R Barnidge; Edward A Dratz; Therese Martin; Leo E Bonilla; Liam B Moran; Arnold Lindall
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Evaluation of a cleavable stable isotope labeled synthetic peptide for absolute protein quantification using LC-MS/MS.

Authors:  David R Barnidge; Gregory D Hall; Jeanne L Stocker; David C Muddiman
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.466

3.  Mass spectrometric quantification of endogenous beta-endorphin.

Authors:  C Dass; J J Kusmierz; D M Desiderio
Journal:  Biol Mass Spectrom       Date:  1991-03

Review 4.  Isotope dilution strategies for absolute quantitative proteomics.

Authors:  Virginie Brun; Christophe Masselon; Jérôme Garin; Alain Dupuis
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 4.044

5.  Multiple reaction monitoring-based, multiplexed, absolute quantitation of 45 proteins in human plasma.

Authors:  Michael A Kuzyk; Derek Smith; Juncong Yang; Tyra J Cross; Angela M Jackson; Darryl B Hardie; N Leigh Anderson; Christoph H Borchers
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 5.911

6.  Protein quantification by isotope dilution mass spectrometry of proteolytic fragments: cleavage rate and accuracy.

Authors:  Cristian G Arsene; Rüdiger Ohlendorf; William Burkitt; Caroline Pritchard; André Henrion; Gavin O'Connor; David M Bunk; Bernd Güttler
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Isotope-labeled protein standards: toward absolute quantitative proteomics.

Authors:  Virginie Brun; Alain Dupuis; Annie Adrait; Marlène Marcellin; Damien Thomas; Magali Court; François Vandenesch; Jérôme Garin
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 5.911

8.  Towards a systems approach for lignin biosynthesis in Populus trichocarpa: transcript abundance and specificity of the monolignol biosynthetic genes.

Authors:  Rui Shi; Ying-Hsuan Sun; Quanzi Li; Steffen Heber; Ronald Sederoff; Vincent L Chiang
Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 4.927

9.  Multiplexed absolute quantification in proteomics using artificial QCAT proteins of concatenated signature peptides.

Authors:  Robert J Beynon; Mary K Doherty; Julie M Pratt; Simon J Gaskell
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 10.  Mass spectrometry based targeted protein quantification: methods and applications.

Authors:  Sheng Pan; Ruedi Aebersold; Ru Chen; John Rush; David R Goodlett; Martin W McIntosh; Jing Zhang; Teresa A Brentnall
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.466

View more
  20 in total

1.  Regulation of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) gene family in wood forming tissue of Populus trichocarpa.

Authors:  Rui Shi; Christopher M Shuford; Jack P Wang; Ying-Hsuan Sun; Zhichang Yang; Hsi-Chuan Chen; Sermsawat Tunlaya-Anukit; Quanzi Li; Jie Liu; David C Muddiman; Ronald R Sederoff; Vincent L Chiang
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 4.116

2.  Highly Reproducible Automated Proteomics Sample Preparation Workflow for Quantitative Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Qin Fu; Michael P Kowalski; Mitra Mastali; Sarah J Parker; Kimia Sobhani; Irene van den Broek; Christie L Hunter; Jennifer E Van Eyk
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.466

3.  Recommendations for the Generation, Quantification, Storage, and Handling of Peptides Used for Mass Spectrometry-Based Assays.

Authors:  Andrew N Hoofnagle; Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Steven A Carr; Eric Kuhn; Tao Liu; Sam A Massoni; Stefani N Thomas; R Reid Townsend; Lisa J Zimmerman; Emily Boja; Jing Chen; Daniel L Crimmins; Sherri R Davies; Yuqian Gao; Tara R Hiltke; Karen A Ketchum; Christopher R Kinsinger; Mehdi Mesri; Matthew R Meyer; Wei-Jun Qian; Regine M Schoenherr; Mitchell G Scott; Tujin Shi; Gordon R Whiteley; John A Wrobel; Chaochao Wu; Brad L Ackermann; Ruedi Aebersold; David R Barnidge; David M Bunk; Nigel Clarke; Jordan B Fishman; Russ P Grant; Ulrike Kusebauch; Mark M Kushnir; Mark S Lowenthal; Robert L Moritz; Hendrik Neubert; Scott D Patterson; Alan L Rockwood; John Rogers; Ravinder J Singh; Jennifer E Van Eyk; Steven H Wong; Shucha Zhang; Daniel W Chan; Xian Chen; Matthew J Ellis; Daniel C Liebler; Karin D Rodland; Henry Rodriguez; Richard D Smith; Zhen Zhang; Hui Zhang; Amanda G Paulovich
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  Quantification of GDF11 and Myostatin in Human Aging and Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Marissa J Schafer; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Patrick M Vanderboom; Brian Kotajarvi; Thomas A White; Matthew M Moore; Charles J Bruce; Kevin L Greason; Rakesh M Suri; Sundeep Khosla; Jordan D Miller; H Robert Bergen; Nathan K LeBrasseur
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 27.287

5.  Large-Scale Interlaboratory Study to Develop, Analytically Validate and Apply Highly Multiplexed, Quantitative Peptide Assays to Measure Cancer-Relevant Proteins in Plasma.

Authors:  Susan E Abbatiello; Birgit Schilling; D R Mani; Lisa J Zimmerman; Steven C Hall; Brendan MacLean; Matthew Albertolle; Simon Allen; Michael Burgess; Michael P Cusack; Mousumi Gosh; Victoria Hedrick; Jason M Held; H Dorota Inerowicz; Angela Jackson; Hasmik Keshishian; Christopher R Kinsinger; John Lyssand; Lee Makowski; Mehdi Mesri; Henry Rodriguez; Paul Rudnick; Pawel Sadowski; Nell Sedransk; Kent Shaddox; Stephen J Skates; Eric Kuhn; Derek Smith; Jeffery R Whiteaker; Corbin Whitwell; Shucha Zhang; Christoph H Borchers; Susan J Fisher; Bradford W Gibson; Daniel C Liebler; Michael J MacCoss; Thomas A Neubert; Amanda G Paulovich; Fred E Regnier; Paul Tempst; Steven A Carr
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 5.911

6.  Monolignol pathway 4-coumaric acid:coenzyme A ligases in Populus trichocarpa: novel specificity, metabolic regulation, and simulation of coenzyme A ligation fluxes.

Authors:  Hsi-Chuan Chen; Jina Song; Cranos M Williams; Christopher M Shuford; Jie Liu; Jack P Wang; Quanzi Li; Rui Shi; Emine Gokce; Joel Ducoste; David C Muddiman; Ronald R Sederoff; Vincent L Chiang
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Quantitative ADME proteomics - CYP and UGT enzymes in the Beagle dog liver and intestine.

Authors:  Aki T Heikkinen; Arno Friedlein; Mariette Matondo; Oliver J D Hatley; Aleksanteri Petsalo; Risto Juvonen; Aleksandra Galetin; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan; Ruedi Aebersold; Jens Lamerz; Tom Dunkley; Paul Cutler; Neil Parrott
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 8.  Alpha-synuclein post-translational modifications as potential biomarkers for Parkinson disease and other synucleinopathies.

Authors:  Adrien W Schmid; Bruno Fauvet; Marc Moniatte; Hilal A Lashuel
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 5.911

9.  Cellulose Synthase Stoichiometry in Aspen Differs from Arabidopsis and Norway Spruce.

Authors:  Xueyang Zhang; Pia Guadalupe Dominguez; Manoj Kumar; Joakim Bygdell; Sergey Miroshnichenko; Björn Sundberg; Gunnar Wingsle; Totte Niittylä
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Multi-peptide nLC-PC-IDMS-SRM-based assay for the quantification of biomarkers in the chicken ovarian cancer model.

Authors:  Genna L Andrews Kingon; James N Petitte; David C Muddiman; Adam M Hawkridge
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 3.608

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.