Literature DB >> 22770385

Nano-scale liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry and on-the-fly orthogonal array optimization for quantification of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies and the application in preclinical analysis.

Xiaotao Duan1, Lipeng Dai2, Shang-Chiung Chen1, Joseph P Balthasar1, Jun Qu3.   

Abstract

Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) constitute a group of highly effective agents for treating various refractory diseases. Nonetheless it is challenging to achieve selective and accurate quantification of mAb in pharmaceutical matrices, which is required by PK studies. Liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry under selected reaction monitoring mode (LC/SRM-MS) is emerging as an attractive alternative to immunoassays because of the high specificity and multiplexing capacity it provides, but may fall short in terms of sensitivity, reliability and quantitative accuracy. Moreover, the strategy for optimization of the MS conditions for many candidates of signature peptides (SP) and the selection of the optimal SP for quantification remains elusive. In this study, we employed a suite of technical advances to overcome these difficulties, which include: (i) a nano-LC/SRM-MS approach to achieve high analytical sensitivity, (ii) a high-resolution nano-LC/LTQ/Orbitrap for confident identification of candidate peptides, (iii) an on-the-fly orthogonal array optimization (OAO) method for the high-throughput, accurate and reproducible optimization for numerous candidate peptides in a single LC/MS run without using synthesized peptides, (iv) a comprehensive evaluation of stability of candidates in matrix using the optimized SRM parameters, (v) the use of two unique SP for quantification of one mAb to gauge possible degradation/modification in biological system and thus enhancing data reliability (e.g. rejection of data if the deviation between the two SP is greater than 25%) and (vi) the utilization of purified target protein as the calibrator to eliminate the risk of severe negative biases that could occur when a synthesized peptide is used as calibrator. To show a proof of concept, this strategy is applied in the quantification of cT84.66, a chimeric, anti-CEA antibody, in preclinical mouse models. A low detection limit of the mAb down to 3.2 ng/mL was achieved, which is substantially more sensitive than established immunoassay methods for anti-CEA antibodies. The quantitative method showed good linearity (within the range of 12.9 ng/mL to 32.3 μg/mL in plasma), accuracy and precision. Additionally, the ultra-low sample consumption (2 μL plasma per preparation) permits the acquisition of an entire set of time course data from the same mouse, which represents a prominent advantage for PK study using small-animal models. The developed method enabled an accurate PK investigation of cT84.66 in mice following intravenous and subcutaneous administrations at relatively low doses over an extended period of time. The strategy employed in this study can be easily adapted to the sensitive and accurate analysis of other mAb and therapeutic proteins. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22770385      PMCID: PMC4073258          DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  46 in total

1.  Circulating anti-CEA antibodies in the sera of patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  D Haidopoulos; M M Konstadoulakis; P T Antonakis; D G Alexiou; A M Manouras; S M Katsaragakis; G F Androulakis
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.424

2.  Technology evaluation: cT84.66, City of Hope.

Authors:  Rosalyn D Blumenthal
Journal:  Curr Opin Mol Ther       Date:  2004-02

3.  Kinetics of chemical degradation in monoclonal antibodies: relationship between rates at the molecular and peptide levels.

Authors:  Roxana Ionescu; Josef Vlasak
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 4.  Critical comparison of MS and immunoassays for the bioanalysis of therapeutic antibodies.

Authors:  Eric Ezan; Francis Bitsch
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Computational prediction of proteotypic peptides for quantitative proteomics.

Authors:  Parag Mallick; Markus Schirle; Sharon S Chen; Mark R Flory; Hookeun Lee; Daniel Martin; Jeffrey Ranish; Brian Raught; Robert Schmitt; Thilo Werner; Bernhard Kuster; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-12-31       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 6.  Selected reaction monitoring applied to proteomics.

Authors:  Sebastien Gallien; Elodie Duriez; Bruno Domon
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.982

7.  Protein quantification by MALDI-selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry using sulfonate derivatized peptides.

Authors:  Antoine Lesur; Emmanuel Varesio; Gérard Hopfgartner
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  An ELISA for quantification of T84.66, a monoclonal anti-CEA antibody, in mouse plasma.

Authors:  Shweta R Urva; Victor C Yang; Joseph P Balthasar
Journal:  J Immunoassay Immunochem       Date:  2010

9.  Ultrasensitive quantification of serum vitamin D metabolites using selective solid-phase extraction coupled to microflow liquid chromatography and isotope-dilution mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Xiaotao Duan; Bianca Weinstock-Guttman; Hao Wang; Eunjin Bang; Jun Li; Murali Ramanathan; Jun Qu
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 10.  Mass spectrometry based targeted protein quantification: methods and applications.

Authors:  Sheng Pan; Ruedi Aebersold; Ru Chen; John Rush; David R Goodlett; Martin W McIntosh; Jing Zhang; Teresa A Brentnall
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.466

View more
  11 in total

1.  Development of an antibody-free ID-LC MS method for the quantification of procalcitonin in human serum at sub-microgram per liter level using a peptide-based calibration.

Authors:  Huu-Hien Huynh; Amandine Bœuf; Maxence Derbez-Morin; Anne-Marie Dupuy; Béatrice Lalere; Vincent Delatour; Joëlle Vinh
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 2.  Toward sensitive and accurate analysis of antibody biotherapeutics by liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Bo An; Ming Zhang; Jun Qu
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.922

3.  Sensitive, High-Throughput, and Robust Trapping-Micro-LC-MS Strategy for the Quantification of Biomarkers and Antibody Biotherapeutics.

Authors:  Ming Zhang; Bo An; Yang Qu; Shichen Shen; Wei Fu; Yuan-Ju Chen; Xue Wang; Rebeccah Young; John M Canty; Joseph P Balthasar; Keeley Murphy; Debadeep Bhattacharyya; Jonathan Josephs; Luca Ferrari; Shaolian Zhou; Surendra Bansal; Faye Vazvaei; Jun Qu
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 4.  Quantitative proteomics in cardiovascular research: global and targeted strategies.

Authors:  Xiaomeng Shen; Rebeccah Young; John M Canty; Jun Qu
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 5.  Approaches for the detection and analysis of antidrug antibodies to biopharmaceuticals: A review.

Authors:  Kyungah Suh; Isaac Kyei; David S Hage
Journal:  J Sep Sci       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 3.614

6.  Impact of Sample Matrix on Accuracy of Peptide Quantification: Assessment of Calibrator and Internal Standard Selection and Method Validation.

Authors:  Samuel L Arnold; Faith Stevison; Nina Isoherranen
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Effects of calibration approaches on the accuracy for LC-MS targeted quantification of therapeutic protein.

Authors:  Eslam Nouri-Nigjeh; Ming Zhang; Tao Ji; Haoying Yu; Bo An; Xiaotao Duan; Joseph Balthasar; Robert W Johnson; Jun Qu
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 8.  Current LC-MS-based strategies for characterization and quantification of antibody-drug conjugates.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Zhu; Shihan Huo; Chao Xue; Bo An; Jun Qu
Journal:  J Pharm Anal       Date:  2020-05-23

Review 9.  MS1 ion current-based quantitative proteomics: A promising solution for reliable analysis of large biological cohorts.

Authors:  Xue Wang; Shichen Shen; Sailee Suryakant Rasam; Jun Qu
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 10.946

10.  Reproducible ion-current-based approach for 24-plex comparison of the tissue proteomes of hibernating versus normal myocardium in swine models.

Authors:  Jun Qu; Rebeccah Young; Brian J Page; Xiaomeng Shen; Nazneen Tata; Jun Li; Xiaotao Duan; James A Fallavollita; John M Canty
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 4.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.