Literature DB >> 18446386

The international spine registry SPINE TANGO: status quo and first results.

Markus Melloh1, Lukas Staub, Emin Aghayev, Thomas Zweig, Thomas Barz, Jean-Claude Theis, Albert Chavanne, Dieter Grob, Max Aebi, Christoph Roeder.   

Abstract

With an official life time of over 5 years, Spine Tango can meanwhile be considered the first international spine registry. In this paper we present an overview of frequency statistics of Spine Tango for demonstrating the genesis of questionnaire development and the constantly increasing activity in the registry. Results from two exemplar studies serve for showing concepts of data analysis applied to a spine registry. Between 2002 and 2006, about 6,000 datasets were submitted by 25 centres. Descriptive analyses were performed for demographic, surgical and follow-up data of three generations of the Spine Tango surgery and follow-up forms. The two exemplar studies used multiple linear regression models to identify potential predictor variables for the occurrence of dura lesions in posterior spinal fusion, and to evaluate which covariates influenced the length of hospital stay. Over the study period there was a rise in median patient age from 52.3 to 58.6 years in the Spine Tango data pool and an increasing percentage of degenerative diseases as main pathology from 59.9 to 71.4%. Posterior decompression was the most frequent surgical measure. About one-third of all patients had documented follow-ups. The complication rate remained below 10%. The exemplar studies identified "centre of intervention" and "number of segments of fusion" as predictors of the occurrence of dura lesions in posterior spinal fusion surgery. Length of hospital stay among patients with posterior fusion was significantly influenced by "centre of intervention", "surgeon credentials", "number of segments of fusion", "age group" and "sex". Data analysis from Spine Tango is possible but complicated by the incompatibility of questionnaire generations 1 and 2 with the more recent generation 3. Although descriptive and also analytic studies at evidence level 2++ can be performed, findings cannot yet be generalised to any specific country or patient population. Current limitations of Spine Tango include the low number and short duration of follow-ups and the lack of sufficiently detailed patient data on subgroup levels. Although the number of participants is steadily growing, no country is yet represented with a sufficient number of hospitals. Nevertheless, the benefits of the project for the whole spine community become increasingly visible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18446386      PMCID: PMC2527410          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-008-0665-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  21 in total

1.  Perioperative complications of threaded cylindrical lumbar interbody fusion devices: anterior versus posterior approach.

Authors:  Anthony A Scaduto; Seth C Gamradt; Warren D Yu; Jerry Huang; Rick B Delamarter; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2003-12

2.  Single-level lumbar spine fusion: a comparison of anterior and posterior approaches.

Authors:  Ben B Pradhan; John A Nassar; Rick B Delamarter; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2002-10

3.  A centralized total joint replacement registry using web-based technologies.

Authors:  C Röder; A El-Kerdi; S Eggli; M Aebi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use.

Authors:  R A Deyo; M Battie; A J Beurskens; C Bombardier; P Croft; B Koes; A Malmivaara; M Roland; M Von Korff; G Waddell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Threaded titanium cages for lumbar interbody fusions.

Authors:  C D Ray
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  S C Humphreys; S D Hodges; A G Patwardhan; J C Eck; R B Murphy; L A Covington
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Long-term results of lumbar spine surgery complicated by unintended incidental durotomy.

Authors:  A A Jones; J L Stambough; R A Balderston; R H Rothman; R E Booth
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish lumbar spine study group.

Authors:  Peter Fritzell; Olle Hägg; Per Wessberg; Anders Nordwall
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Factors predicting hospital stay, operative time, blood loss, and transfusion in patients undergoing revision posterior lumbar spine decompression, fusion, and segmental instrumentation.

Authors:  Fengyu Zheng; Frank P Cammisa; Harvinder S Sandhu; Federico P Girardi; Safdar N Khan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The Bagby and Kuslich method of lumbar interbody fusion. History, techniques, and 2-year follow-up results of a United States prospective, multicenter trial.

Authors:  S D Kuslich; C L Ulstrom; S L Griffith; J W Ahern; J D Dowdle
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  23 in total

1.  Development of a documentation instrument for the conservative treatment of spinal disorders in the International Spine Registry, Spine Tango.

Authors:  J T Kessler; M Melloh; Thomas Zweig; E Aghayev; C Röder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Cross-cultural adaptation and assessment of the reliability and validity of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) for the Brazilian-Portuguese language.

Authors:  L H F Damasceno; P A G Rocha; E S Barbosa; C A M Barros; F T Canto; H L A Defino; A F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Incidental durotomy in decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: incidence, risk factors and effect on outcomes in the Spine Tango registry.

Authors:  Christian Herren; Rolf Sobottke; Anne F Mannion; Thomas Zweig; Everard Munting; Philippe Otten; Tim Pigott; Jan Siewe; Emin Aghayev
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Benchmarking with Spine Tango: potentials and pitfalls.

Authors:  Christoph Röder; L Staub; D Dietrich; T Zweig; M Melloh; M Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  How to Tango: a manual for implementing Spine Tango.

Authors:  T Zweig; A F Mannion; D Grob; M Melloh; E Munting; A Tuschel; M Aebi; C Röder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  [Traumatic physeal separations of the distal tibia. Occurrence, forms, treatment strategies].

Authors:  R Kraus; U Herbst; G Perler; R Schnettler; C Röder
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  The Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) is a responsive instrument for assessing the outcome of treatment for adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  A F Mannion; A Vila-Casademunt; M Domingo-Sàbat; S Wunderlin; F Pellisé; J Bago; E Acaroglu; A Alanay; F S Pérez-Grueso; I Obeid; F S Kleinstück
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Do surgeon credentials affect the rate of incidental durotomy during spine surgery.

Authors:  N J Murray; A K Demetriades; D Rolton; C Nnadi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Is the duration of pre-operative conservative treatment associated with the clinical outcome following surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis? A study based on the Spine Tango Registry.

Authors:  Thomas Zweig; Juliane Enke; Anne F Mannion; Rolf Sobottke; Markus Melloh; Brian J C Freeman; Emin Aghayev
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Predictors of surgical, general and follow-up complications in lumbar spinal stenosis relative to patient age as emerged from the Spine Tango Registry.

Authors:  Rolf Sobottke; Emin Aghayev; Christoph Röder; Peer Eysel; Stephan K Delank; Thomas Zweig
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.