Literature DB >> 20532924

Development of a documentation instrument for the conservative treatment of spinal disorders in the International Spine Registry, Spine Tango.

J T Kessler1, M Melloh, Thomas Zweig, E Aghayev, C Röder.   

Abstract

Spine Tango is the first and only International Spine Registry in operation to date. So far, only surgical spinal interventions have been recorded and no comparable structured and comprehensive documentation instrument for conservative treatments of spinal disorders is available. This study reports on the development of a documentation instrument for the conservative treatment of spinal disorders by using the Delphi consensus method. It was conducted with a group of international experts in the field. We also assessed the usability of this new assessment tool with a prospective feasibility study on 97 outpatients and inpatients with low back or neck pain undergoing conservative treatment. The new 'Spine Tango conservative' questionnaire proved useful and suitable for the documentation of pathologies, conservative treatments and outcomes of patients with low back or neck problems. A follow-up questionnaire seemed less important in the predominantly outpatient setting. In the feasibility study, between 43 and 63% of patients reached the minimal clinically important difference in pain relief and Core Outcome Measures Index at 3 months after therapy; 87% of patients with back pain and 85% with neck pain were satisfied with the received treatment. With 'Spine Tango conservative' a first step has been taken to develop and implement a complementary system for documentation and evaluation of non-surgical spinal interventions and outcomes within the framework of the International Spine Registry. It proved useful and feasible in a first pilot study, but it will take the experience of many more cases and therapists to develop a version similarly mature as the surgical instruments of Spine Tango.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20532924      PMCID: PMC3048233          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1474-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  47 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-based clinical guidelines submitted to the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council for the management of acute low back pain: a critical review.

Authors:  L G Giles
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  Safety, efficacy, and cost effectiveness of evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute low back pain in primary care.

Authors:  B McGuirk; W King; J Govind; J Lowry; N Bogduk
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  A European spine registry.

Authors:  C Röder; A El-Kerdi; D Grob; M Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-06-28       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  Chris J Main; Amanda C de C Williams
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-09-07

5.  Randomized-controlled trials for surgical implants: are registries an alternative?

Authors:  Markus Melloh; Christoph Röder; Lukas P Staub; Thomas Zweig; Thomas Barz; Jean-Claude Theis; Urs Müller
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.390

Review 6.  Back pain and sciatica.

Authors:  J W Frymoyer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-02-04       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  The economic burden of low back pain: a review of studies published between 1996 and 2001.

Authors:  Andreas Maetzel; Linda Li
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.098

8.  Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality.

Authors:  J W Peabody; J Luck; P Glassman; T R Dresselhaus; M Lee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-04-05       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Philadelphia Panel evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on selected rehabilitation interventions for low back pain.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2001-10

10.  Clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain in primary care: an international comparison.

Authors:  B W Koes; M W van Tulder; R Ostelo; A Kim Burton; G Waddell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  10 in total

1.  Cross-cultural adaptation and assessment of the reliability and validity of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) for the Brazilian-Portuguese language.

Authors:  L H F Damasceno; P A G Rocha; E S Barbosa; C A M Barros; F T Canto; H L A Defino; A F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal review: a survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2011.

Authors:  Michel Benoist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Spine Tango registry data collection in a conservative spinal service: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Samuel Morris; James Booth; James Hegarty
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Comparative effectiveness research across two spine registries.

Authors:  Emin Aghayev; Julia Henning; Everard Munting; Peter Diel; Patrick Moulin; Christoph Röder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted Italian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index.

Authors:  A F Mannion; M Boneschi; M Teli; A Luca; F Zaina; S Negrini; P J Schulz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Norwegian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for low back pain.

Authors:  Kjersti Storheim; Jens Ivar Brox; Ida Løchting; Erik L Werner; Margreth Grotle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Spine Tango annual report 2012.

Authors:  M Neukamp; G Perler; T Pigott; E Munting; M Aebi; C Röder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Shaping conservative spinal services with the Spine Tango Registry.

Authors:  Samuel Morris; James Booth
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Development of an assessment schedule for patients with low back-associated leg pain in primary care: a Delphi consensus study.

Authors:  Kika Konstantinou; Samantha L Hider; Steven Vogel; Ruth Beardmore; Simon Somerville
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  A proposed set of metrics for standardized outcome reporting in the management of low back pain.

Authors:  R Carter Clement; Adina Welander; Caleb Stowell; Thomas D Cha; John L Chen; Michelle Davies; Jeremy C Fairbank; Kevin T Foley; Martin Gehrchen; Olle Hagg; Wilco C Jacobs; Richard Kahler; Safdar N Khan; Isador H Lieberman; Beth Morisson; Donna D Ohnmeiss; Wilco C Peul; Neal H Shonnard; Matthew W Smuck; Tore K Solberg; Bjorn H Stromqvist; Miranda L Van Hooff; Ajay D Wasan; Paul C Willems; William Yeo; Peter Fritzell
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.717

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.