Literature DB >> 22796987

The responsiveness of biological motion processing areas to selective attention towards goals.

John Herrington1, Charlotte Nymberg, Susan Faja, Elinora Price, Robert Schultz.   

Abstract

A growing literature indicates that visual cortex areas viewed as primarily responsive to exogenous stimuli are susceptible to top-down modulation by selective attention. The present study examines whether brain areas involved in biological motion perception are among these areas-particularly with respect to selective attention towards human movement goals. Fifteen participants completed a point-light biological motion study following a two-by-two factorial design, with one factor representing an exogenous manipulation of human movement goals (goal-directed versus random movement), and the other an endogenous manipulation (a goal identification task versus an ancillary color-change task). Both manipulations yielded increased activation in the human homologue of motion-sensitive area MT+ (hMT+) as well as the extrastriate body area (EBA). The endogenous manipulation was associated with increased right posterior superior temporal sulcus (STS) activation, whereas the exogenous manipulation was associated with increased activation in left posterior STS. Selective attention towards goals activated a portion of left hMT+/EBA only during the perception of purposeful movement-consistent with emerging theories associating this area with the matching of visual motion input to known goal-directed actions. The overall pattern of results indicates that attention towards the goals of human movement activates biological motion areas. Ultimately, selective attention may explain why some studies examining biological motion show activation in hMT+ and EBA, even when using control stimuli with comparable motion properties.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22796987      PMCID: PMC3482123          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  80 in total

1.  A new anatomical landmark for reliable identification of human area V5/MT: a quantitative analysis of sulcal patterning.

Authors:  S O Dumoulin; R G Bittar; N J Kabani; C L Baker; G Le Goualher; G Bruce Pike; A C Evans
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 2.  The amygdala: vigilance and emotion.

Authors:  M Davis; P J Whalen
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 15.992

3.  Prefrontal regions play a predominant role in imposing an attentional 'set': evidence from fMRI.

Authors:  M T Banich; M P Milham; R A Atchley; N J Cohen; A Webb; T Wszalek; A F Kramer; Z Liang; V Barad; D Gullett; C Shah; C Brown
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2000-09

4.  Dissociation of face-selective cortical responses by attention.

Authors:  Maura L Furey; Topi Tanskanen; Michael S Beauchamp; Sari Avikainen; Kimmo Uutela; Riitta Hari; James V Haxby
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Top-down facilitation of visual recognition.

Authors:  M Bar; K S Kassam; A S Ghuman; J Boshyan; A M Schmid; A M Schmidt; A M Dale; M S Hämäläinen; K Marinkovic; D L Schacter; B R Rosen; E Halgren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex.

Authors:  D J Felleman; D C Van Essen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Brain activity for peripheral biological motion in the posterior superior temporal gyrus and the fusiform gyrus: Dependence on visual hemifield and view orientation.

Authors:  Lars Michels; Raimund Kleiser; Marc H E de Lussanet; Rüdiger J Seitz; Markus Lappe
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Grasping the intentions of others: the perceived intentionality of an action influences activity in the superior temporal sulcus during social perception.

Authors:  Kevin A Pelphrey; James P Morris; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  FMRI responses to video and point-light displays of moving humans and manipulable objects.

Authors:  Michael S Beauchamp; Kathryn E Lee; James V Haxby; Alex Martin
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Connectivity analysis reveals a cortical network for eye gaze perception.

Authors:  Lauri Nummenmaa; Luca Passamonti; James Rowe; Andrew D Engell; Andrew J Calder
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  7 in total

1.  From personal fear to mass panic: The neurological basis of crowd perception.

Authors:  Elisabeth M J Huis In 't Veld; Beatrice de Gelder
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Lateral occipitotemporal cortex (LOTC) activity is greatest while viewing dance compared to visualization and movement: learning and expertise effects.

Authors:  Paula M Di Nota; Gabriella Levkov; Rachel Bar; Joseph F X DeSouza
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Task-Dependent Warping of Semantic Representations During Search for Visual Action Categories.

Authors:  Mo Shahdloo; Emin Çelik; Burcu A Ürgen; Jack L Gallant; Tolga Çukur
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 6.709

4.  Neural interactions in occipitotemporal cortex during basic human movement perception by dynamic causal modeling.

Authors:  Jin Gu; Baolin Liu; Xiaolin Sun; Fangyuan Ma; Xianglin Li
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 3.978

5.  Neural Mechanisms of Body Awareness in Infants.

Authors:  M L Filippetti; S Lloyd-Fox; M R Longo; T Farroni; M H Johnson
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Human area MT+ shows load-dependent activation during working memory maintenance with continuously morphing stimulation.

Authors:  Daniela Galashan; Thorsten Fehr; Andreas K Kreiter; Manfred Herrmann
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.288

7.  The timing and precision of action prediction in the aging brain.

Authors:  Nadine Diersch; Alex L Jones; Emily S Cross
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 5.038

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.