Literature DB >> 18443769

Goal-related planning constraints in bimanual grasping and placing of objects.

Charmayne M L Hughes1, Elizabeth A Franz.   

Abstract

Our primary objective was to examine the possible interplay of the end-state comfort effect and bimanual temporal and spatial coupling constraints in a grasp-to-place task. Unimanual and bimanual grasping and placing tasks were employed with manipulations on initial comfort (by use of potentially interfering obstacles) and target goals (using various demands on end goal object orientations). Confirming previous temporal findings, incongruent bimanual tasks were considerably slower in initiation time and movement time than congruent ones, reflecting costs in conceptualizing, planning, and completion of the task. With respect to spatial constraints, when the same goal was present for both hands there was strong evidence of the influence of both end-state comfort and bimanual constraints. This was often not the case when the task demands differed for the two hands, although the primary task goals were still attained. We suggest that the implementation of constraints is not based on a strict hierarchy; rather, certain constraints become dominant depending on the task and situation.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18443769     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1387-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  24 in total

1.  Bimanual coupling in amputees with phantom limbs.

Authors:  E A Franz; V S Ramachandran
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Hemispheric competition in left-handers on bimanual reaction time tasks.

Authors:  Yin-Chen Shen; Elizabeth A Franz
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  End-state comfort in bimanual object manipulation.

Authors:  Matthias Weigelt; Wilfried Kunde; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2006

4.  Chi-squared and Fisher-Irwin tests of two-by-two tables with small sample recommendations.

Authors:  Ian Campbell
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Developmental change in interhemispheric communication: evidence from bimanual cost.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Franz; Sarah Fahey
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-12

6.  Spatial topological constraints in a bimanual task.

Authors:  E A Franz; H N Zelaznik; G McCabe
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1991-09

7.  Environmentally-specified patterns of movement coordination in normal and split-brain subjects.

Authors:  B Tuller; J A Kelso
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Constraints on human arm movement trajectories.

Authors:  R G Marteniuk; C L MacKenzie; M Jeannerod; S Athenes; C Dugas
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1987-09

9.  On the coordination of two-handed movements.

Authors:  J A Kelso; D L Southard; D Goodman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  On the nature of human interlimb coordination.

Authors:  J A Kelso; D L Southard; D Goodman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-03-09       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  25 in total

1.  Representation of grasp postures and anticipatory motor planning in children.

Authors:  Tino Stöckel; Charmayne M L Hughes; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-11-11

2.  What to do and how to do it: action representations in tool use.

Authors:  Cristina Massen; Christine Sattler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  An investigation into manual asymmetries in grasp behavior and kinematics during an object manipulation task.

Authors:  Christian Seegelke; Charmayne M L Hughes; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Effects of stimulus cueing on bimanual grasp posture planning.

Authors:  Charmayne M L Hughes; Christian Seegelke; Paola Reissig; Christoph Schütz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Left visual field preference for a bimanual grasping task with ecologically valid object sizes.

Authors:  Ada Le; Matthias Niemeier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Hemispheric lateralization does not affect the cognitive and mechanical cost of a sequential motor task.

Authors:  Christoph Schütz; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The relation between measures of cognitive and motor functioning in 5- to 6-year-old children.

Authors:  Tino Stöckel; Charmayne M L Hughes
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-03-28

Review 8.  Cognition, action, and object manipulation.

Authors:  David A Rosenbaum; Kate M Chapman; Matthias Weigelt; Daniel J Weiss; Robrecht van der Wel
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  A right hemisphere dominance for bimanual grasps.

Authors:  Ada Le; Matthias Niemeier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The contribution of cognitive, kinematic, and dynamic factors to anticipatory grasp selection.

Authors:  Oliver Herbort; Martin V Butz; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.