Literature DB >> 18440779

Experimental analysis of retention forces of different magnetic devices for bone-anchored auricular facial prostheses.

A Voigt1, S Christ, M Klein.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine which combination of differently designed magnetic abutments provides the best retention for an auricular prosthesis. The withdrawal forces of eight combinations of abutments were measured and results compared. There was a significantly higher withdrawal force in arrangements containing three magnets over only two. The highest withdrawal force was found in the combination of one telescopic magnet and two large spherical magnets (median: 7.69 N), whereas two telescopic magnets alone showed the lowest withdrawal force (3.41 N). The use of two conical magnets increased retention slightly, but the median retention force remained the same (3.41 N). The commonly used combination of two small spherical magnets and one telescopic magnet showed the lowest retention of combinations consisting of three magnets (4.94 N). There seems to be no difference in median withdrawal force if a conical magnet instead of a telescopic magnet is used. The withdrawal force at a 45 degrees angle was about 10% higher than the vertical force but the difference was not significant. The rupture force needed to tear the magnet completely out of the silicone was 240.6-519.7 N (mean 331.74 N) and therefore over 10 times higher than magnetic retention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18440779     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2008.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  5 in total

Review 1.  Prosthetic Reconstruction of Orbital Defects.

Authors:  Aurora Vincent; Scott Kohlert; Sameep Kadakia; Raja Sawhney; Yadranko Ducic
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 2.  Prosthetics in Facial Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jaclyn Klimczak; Samuel Helman; Sameep Kadakia; Raja Sawhney; Manoj Abraham; Allison K Vest; Yadranko Ducic
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2017-05-22

Review 3.  Osseointegrated Implants and Prosthetic Reconstruction Following Skull Base Surgery.

Authors:  Shirley Hu; Demetri Arnaoutakis; Sameep Kadakia; Allison Vest; Raja Sawhney; Yadranko Ducic
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.314

4.  A different wax sculpture technique for implant-retained auricular prosthesis.

Authors:  Necla Demir; Pınar Cevik; Yener Okutan; A Nilgun Ozturk; Bahar Colpan
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

5.  A simplified technique for orientation of a bone anchored auricular prostheses: a clinical report.

Authors:  Hussein G El Charkawi; Ahmed G El Sharkawy
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2012-10-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.