Literature DB >> 29075160

Osseointegrated Implants and Prosthetic Reconstruction Following Skull Base Surgery.

Shirley Hu1, Demetri Arnaoutakis2, Sameep Kadakia1, Allison Vest3, Raja Sawhney4, Yadranko Ducic5.   

Abstract

Rehabilitation following ablative skull base surgery remains a challenging task, given the complexity of the anatomical region, despite the recent advances in reconstructive surgery. Remnant defects following resection of skull base tumors are often not amenable to primary closure. As such, numerous techniques have been described for reconstruction, including local rotational muscle flaps, pedicled flaps with skin paddle, or even free tissue transfer. However, not all patients are appropriate surgical candidates and therefore may instead benefit from nonsurgical options for functional and aesthetic restoration. Osseointegrated implants and biocompatible prostheses provide a viable alternative for such a patient population. The purpose of this review serves to highlight current options for prosthetic rehabilitation of skull base defects and describe their indications, advantages, and disadvantages.

Entities:  

Keywords:  osseointegrated implants; prosthetics; skull base defects; tumor ablative surgery

Year:  2017        PMID: 29075160      PMCID: PMC5656447          DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1607201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Plast Surg        ISSN: 1535-2188            Impact factor:   2.314


  68 in total

1.  Evaluation of implant losses and skin reactions around extraoral bone-anchored implants: A 0- to 8-year follow-up.

Authors:  R A Reyes; A Tjellström; G Granström
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Rapid development of auricular prosthesis using CAD and rapid prototyping technologies.

Authors:  K Subburaj; C Nair; S Rajesh; S M Meshram; B Ravi
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 2.789

3.  Maxillofacial rehabilitation after rhinectomy using two different treatment options: clinical reports.

Authors:  L Ciocca; P Maremonti; B Bianchi; R Scotti
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.837

4.  Costal cartilage or conchal cartilage for aesthetic and structural reconstruction of lower pole ear defects.

Authors:  Anthony Cox; Walid Sabbagh; David Gault
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.283

Review 5.  Recent advances in surgery for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Remco de Bree; Charles René Leemans
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.645

6.  Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man.

Authors:  T Albrektsson; P I Brånemark; H A Hansson; J Lindström
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1981

Review 7.  Indications and methods of care for aspects of extraoral osseointegration.

Authors:  J Wolfaardt; G Gehl; M Farmand; G Wilkes
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.789

8.  Effect of multi-adhesive layering on retention of extraoral maxillofacial silicone prostheses in vivo.

Authors:  Sudarat Kiat-Amnuay; Lawrence Gettleman; L Jane Goldsmith
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.426

9.  Implant-retained prosthetic rehabilitation of orbital defects.

Authors:  W J Moran; J A Toljanic; W R Panje
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1996-01

10.  Implant-retained craniofacial prostheses for facial defects.

Authors:  Philipp A Federspil
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-03-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  Reconstructive challenges of sinonasal tumors: A case report.

Authors:  Dragos Octavian Palade; Razvan Hainarosie; Mihaela Pertea; Florin Anghelina; Petronela Zaharia; Cătălina Pietroșanu; Valentin Calu; Valeriu Ardeleanu; Felicia Manole
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 2.447

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.