Literature DB >> 18440738

Effects of activation of the efferent system on psychophysical tuning curves as a function of signal frequency.

Brian C J Moore.   

Abstract

It has been shown that electrical stimulation of the efferent auditory system can influence neural tuning curves in animals. Here, we examined a psychophysical analog of this effect in humans. All of the 19 normally hearing subjects showed a reduction in the amplitude of otoacoustic emissions in one ear when contralateral broadband noise was presented, indicating a functioning efferent system. Psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs) were measured in simultaneous masking in the absence and presence of contralateral stimulation (CS). The CS was a continuous narrowband noise centered at the signal frequency and presented at a level of 50 or 60 dB SL. The CS had no consistent effect on the masker level at the tips of the PTCs. For the two highest signal frequencies (2000 and 4000 Hz), the CS reduced the masker level required for threshold on both the low- and high-frequency sides of the PTCs, and the sharpness of tuning, as measured by Q10, decreased significantly. For the two lowest signal frequencies (500 and 1000 Hz), the masker level required for threshold on the low-frequency sides of the PTCs increased with CS, and the Q10 values increased significantly. The general pattern of the results was consistent with that observed for electrical stimulation of the efferent system in animals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18440738     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  14 in total

1.  What is the role of the medial olivocochlear system in speech-in-noise processing?

Authors:  Jessica de Boer; A Roger D Thornton; Katrin Krumbholz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The endocochlear potential alters cochlear micromechanics.

Authors:  Stefan Jacob; Martin Pienkowski; Anders Fridberger
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Psychoacoustic measurements of ipsilateral cochlear gain reduction as a function of signal frequency.

Authors:  Kristina DeRoy Milvae; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Contralateral efferent reflex effects on threshold and suprathreshold psychoacoustical tuning curves at low and high frequencies.

Authors:  Enzo Aguilar; Almudena Eustaquio-Martin; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-20

5.  Acoustic stimulation of human medial olivocochlear efferents reduces stimulus-frequency and click-evoked otoacoustic emission delays: Implications for cochlear filter bandwidths.

Authors:  Nikolas A Francis; John J Guinan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and hearing threshold fine structure.

Authors:  James B Dewey; Jungmee Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-23

7.  The effect of broadband elicitor laterality on psychoacoustic gain reduction across signal frequency.

Authors:  William B Salloom; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.482

8.  Reflex control of the human inner ear: a half-octave offset in medial efferent feedback that is consistent with an efferent role in the control of masking.

Authors:  Watjana Lilaonitkul; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  No Effect of Musical Training on Frequency Selectivity Estimated Using Three Methods.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Jie Wan; Ajanth Varathanathan; Sophie Naddell; Thomas Baer
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 10.  The role of the medial olivocochlear reflex in psychophysical masking and intensity resolution in humans: a review.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 2.974

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.