Literature DB >> 18438236

Acute effects of static versus dynamic stretching on isometric peak torque, electromyography, and mechanomyography of the biceps femoris muscle.

Trent J Herda1, Joel T Cramer, Eric D Ryan, Malachy P McHugh, Jeffrey R Stout.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the acute effects of static versus dynamic stretching on peak torque (PT) and electromyographic (EMG), and mechanomyographic (MMG) amplitude of the biceps femoris muscle (BF) during isometric maximal voluntary contractions of the leg flexors at four different knee joint angles. Fourteen men ((mean +/- SD) age, 25 +/- 4 years) performed two isometric leg flexion maximal voluntary contractions at knee joint angles of 41 degrees , 61 degrees , 81 degrees , and 101 degrees below full leg extension. EMG (muV) and MMG (m x s(-2)) signals were recorded from the BF muscle while PT values (Nm) were sampled from an isokinetic dynamometer. The right hamstrings were stretched with either static (stretching time, 9.2 +/- 0.4 minutes) or dynamic (9.1 +/- 0.3 minutes) stretching exercises. Four repetitions of three static stretching exercises were held for 30 seconds each, whereas four sets of three dynamic stretching exercises were performed (12-15 repetitions) with each set lasting 30 seconds. PT decreased after the static stretching at 81 degrees (p = 0.019) and 101 degrees (p = 0.001) but not at other angles. PT did not change (p > 0.05) after the dynamic stretching. EMG amplitude remained unchanged after the static stretching (p > 0.05) but increased after the dynamic stretching at 101 degrees (p < 0.001) and 81 degrees (p < 0.001). MMG amplitude increased in response to the static stretching at 101 degrees (p = 0.003), whereas the dynamic stretching increased MMG amplitude at all joint angles (p </= 0.05). These results suggested that the decreases in strength after the static stretching may have been the result of mechanical rather than neural mechanisms for the BF muscle. Overall, an acute bout of dynamic stretching may be less detrimental to muscle strength than static stretching for the hamstrings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18438236     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31816a82ec

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  37 in total

1.  Anterior cruciate ligament injury in elite football: a prospective three-cohort study.

Authors:  Markus Waldén; Martin Hägglund; Henrik Magnusson; Jan Ekstrand
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Current concepts in muscle stretching for exercise and rehabilitation.

Authors:  Phil Page
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-02

3.  The effect of different dynamic stretch velocities on jump performance.

Authors:  Iain M Fletcher
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Acute bouts of upper and lower body static and dynamic stretching increase non-local joint range of motion.

Authors:  David George Behm; Tyler Cavanaugh; Patrick Quigley; Jonathan Christopher Reid; Priscyla Silva Monteiro Nardi; Paulo Henrique Marchetti
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Acute effects of passive stretching on the electromechanical delay and evoked twitch properties.

Authors:  Pablo B Costa; Eric D Ryan; Trent J Herda; Ashley A Walter; Katherine M Hoge; Joel T Cramer
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 6.  A review of the acute effects of static and dynamic stretching on performance.

Authors:  David G Behm; Anis Chaouachi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Acute Effects of Dynamic Stretching on Mechanical Properties Result From both Muscle-Tendon Stretching and Muscle Warm-Up.

Authors:  Jules Opplert; Nicolas Babault
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

8.  Stretching Combined with Repetitive Small Length Changes of the Plantar Flexors Enhances Their Passive Extensibility while Not Compromising Strength.

Authors:  Naoki Ikeda; Takayuki Inami; Yasuo Kawakami
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.988

9.  The effects of different durations of static stretching within a comprehensive warm-up on voluntary and evoked contractile properties.

Authors:  Jonathan C Reid; Rebecca Greene; James D Young; Daniel D Hodgson; Anthony J Blazevich; David G Behm
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  The effect of warm-up, static stretching and dynamic stretching on hamstring flexibility in previously injured subjects.

Authors:  Kieran O'Sullivan; Elaine Murray; David Sainsbury
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.